Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2023 Mar 30;10(6):nwad085. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad085

Tandem organic solar cells with 20.6% efficiency enabled by reduced voltage losses

Jianqiu Wang 1,2, Zhong Zheng 3,4,, Pengqing Bi 5, Zhihao Chen 6,7, Yafei Wang 8,9, Xiaoyu Liu 10,11, Shaoqing Zhang 12,13, Xiaotao Hao 14, Maojie Zhang 15,, Yongfang Li 16,17,18, Jianhui Hou 19,20,21,
PMCID: PMC10337743  PMID: 37448581

ABSTRACT

Large voltage losses are the main obstacle for achieving high efficiency in organic solar cells (OSCs). Here we construct ternary OSCs by introducing an asymmetric small molecule acceptor AITC into PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 system and demonstrate the effectiveness in simultaneously decreasing energy disorder and non-radiative voltage losses. It is found that the introduction of AITC can modify domain size and increase the degree of crystallinity, which enhances open-circuit voltage and power conversion efficiency (19.1%, certified as 18.9%). Inspiringly, an output efficiency of 20.6% of the constructed tandem OSCs based on PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 ternary active layer output a recorded efficiency of 20.6% (certified as 20.3%), which is the highest value in OSCs field to date. This work demonstrates that decreasing the voltage losses by ternary strategy and constructing of tandem architecture are effective approaches towards improving photovoltaic performance.

Keywords: organic solar cells, power conversion efficiency, voltage losses, tandem cells, ternary strategy


Tandem organic solar cells with recorded efficiency are achieved by implementing the ternary strategy to simultaneously reduce energy disorder and non-radiative voltage losses.

INTRODUCTION

Organic solar cells (OSCs) have attracted wide attention because of their light weight, good mechanical flexibility and tunable semitransparency [1–4]. Power conversion efficiency (PCE) is a critical parameter for solar cell applications, and can be improved by material innovation and device engineering. Till now, the PCEs of single-junction and tandem OSCs have been improved to 19.6% and 20.2%, respectively [5,6]. However, there is still a gap of PCE between OSCs and other photovoltaic technologies due to the suppressive open-circuit voltage (VOC) imposed by the relatively large voltage losses (ΔVloss) [7–10]. To restrain the ΔVloss is an important topic in the field of OSCs society.

ΔVloss in a solar cell is defined as the difference between the optical bandgap divided by elemental charge (Eg/q) and open-circuit voltage (VOC), which can be calculated quantitatively by the principle of detailed balance. As all these parameters are measurable, it is easy to compare the ΔVloss in OSCs with other solar cells [8,11–14]. In particular, the radiative and non-radiative charge recombination constitutes major parts of the ΔVloss. The radiative voltage loss generally originates from two parts. The first is the radiative recombination above the optical gap (ΔV1), which is unavoidable for all solar cells [11]. The other radiative loss is ascribed to radiative recombination below the optical gap (ΔV2). This part can be suppressed by reducing the degree of energetic disorder or reorganization energy [8,14–16], and ΔV2 is already below 50 mV in the high-performance OSCs [8,14,17]. As another component of ΔVloss, the non-radiative recombination voltage loss (ΔV3) is intrinsically linked to the external electroluminescence quantum efficiency (EQEEL) of the OSCs [12,18,19]. In state-of-the-art OSCs, EQEEL is roughly 10−4–10−5, corresponding to a ΔV3 of 0.23–0.29 V [20]. If over 21% and 24% PCE need to be achieved in single-junction and tandem OSCs, ΔV3 should be restrained to 0.15 V without sacrificing ΔV2.

Currently, innovation of materials and upgrading of device structures are the main strategies employed to reduce the ΔVloss in OSCs [10,13,14,19]. For instance, the design and synthesis of ITIC derivatives boost the EQEEL to the order of ∼10−4, which is much higher than that of fullerene-based OSCs (EQEEL below 10−6). This leads to the reduction of ΔV3 and ΔVloss to 0.40 V and 0.70 V, respectively, and PCE of ∼15% is obtained [21]. Recently, Y6-families non-fullerene materials show their EQEEL reaching the order of 10−4, which gives rise to the ΔV3 and ΔVloss of OSCs to 0.25 V and 0.55 V, respectively, and the corresponding PCEs are pushed to 18% [22,23]. In terms of device structure upgrades, the ternary strategy of introducing a third component into the binary active layers has been demonstrated as an efficient and convenient method to address the voltage loss [13,14,24]. On the other hand, tandem architecture emerges as a promising strategy to suppress ΔV3 and ΔVloss that originated from the vibrational relaxation of hot excitons in single-junction OSCs [25,26]. In practice, although there have been valuable simulation and experimental studies on the effect of device optimization on ΔVloss of OSCs, there is a lack of research focusing on reducing the ΔV3 without sacrificing the external quantum efficiency (EQE) edge; decreasing the ΔV2 by reducing the energy disorder and optimizing the morphology of the ternary active layer.

Here, we reduce the voltage losses and improve the PCE of OSCs by introducing an asymmetric small molecule acceptor (SMA) AITC as the third component into high-performance PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 binary blends. As expected, the addition of AITC reinforces the molecular packing and tunes the domain size. Consequently, we suppress charge recombination, expedite hole transfer and narrow down energetic disorder and electronic density of states in the active layer. Due to improvements in comprehensive performance, the ternary OSCs exhibit a high fill factor (FF) of 80.5% and a high VOC of 0.88 V with significantly reduced ΔV3, an enormously boosted PCE of 19.1% (certified as 18.9%) is achieved. In addition, the ternary blend is used as the sub-cell active layer in tandem cells and outputs a recorded PCE of 20.6% (certified as 20.3%), which is the highest value for OSCs to date.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Materials and device performance

The molecular structures of PBDB-TCl polymer donor, SMAs BTP-eC9 and AITC are shown in Fig. 1a. Figure 1b shows the absorption spectra of their binary and ternary blend films. The PBDB-TCl : AITC film exhibits strong absorption from 300 to 700 nm, which is well complementary with PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9. The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies of the three films are −5.25 eV and −3.45 eV for PBDB-TCl; −5.66 eV and −4.30 eV for AITC; and −5.74 eV and −3.98 eV for BTP-eC9, measured by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) (Fig. 1c–d). In our previous work, the asymmetric molecule AITC with large dipole moment shows good miscibility with BTP-eC9, which facilitates the formation of a stable mixing phase in blends [24]. Based on materials of three active layers, the single-junction OSC is fabricated. The photovoltaic parameters of OSCs based on the binary and ternary active layers with various ratios of components are provided in Fig. 1e–f, Table 1 and Fig. S1. PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9–based binary OSCs exhibit a VOC of 0.86 V, a short circuit current density (JSC) of 26.2 mA cm−2, an FF of 76.5% and a PCE of 17.2%. The PBDB-TCl : AITC-based binary OSCs show a VOC of 1.09 V, JSC of 14.0 mA cm−2, an FF of 72.6% and a PCE of 11.1%. Moreover, ternary OSCs with an active layer of optimal weight ratio (1 : 1.2 : 0.2) offers a VOC of 0.88 V, a JSC of 26.9 mA cm−2, an FF of 80.5% and a PCE of 19.1%. The PCE of the best ternary OSC is certified as 18.9% by NIM, China (Fig. S2, Fig. 1f and Table 1), which is the one of the highest certified results [6,23,27–30].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Materials characteristics and device photovoltaic performance. (a) Molecular structures of PBDB-TCl polymer donor and SMAs BTP-eC9 and AITC. (b) Absorption spectra of three neat films. (c) UPS results of PBDB-TCl (black line), BTP-eC9 (orange line) and AITC (purple line). (d) Energy level diagram and charge transport dynamic progress of PBDB-TCl, AITC and BTP-eC9. The solid lines and the numbers (4.61, 4.79, and 4.79 eV) represent Fermi energy level of PBDB-TCl, BTP-eC9 and AITC neat films. (e) PCE, Jsc and FF values of OSCs based on PBDB-TCl : AICT : BTP-eC9 with different acceptor ratios (donor/acceptor = 1 : 1.2). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (n = 10). (f) Current density-voltage (J-V) curves of binary and ternary OSCs. The certified result of optimal ternary OSC measured by NIM, China. (g) EQE curves of OSCs based on three blended films. The calculated current density (Jcal.) by integrating the EQE for the OSCs, which agrees well with that acquired from J–V measurements (about 1% errors).

Table 1.

Photovoltaic parameters of single-junction and tandem OSCs under the illumination AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2.

OSCs Active layer Thickness (nm) V OC (V) J SC/Jcal.(mA cm−2)a FF (%) PCE (%)b
Single-junction PBDB-TCl:AITC 117 1.09 14.0/13.9 72.6 11.1 (10.8 ± 0.3)
PBDB-TCl:AITC:BTP-eC9 119 0.88 26.9/26.7 80.5 19.1 (18.7 ± 0.2)
PBDB-TCl:AITC:BTP-eC9 119 0.88 26.9 79.6 18.9c
PBDB-TCl:BTP-eC9 112 0.86 26.2/25.9 76.5 17.2 (16.8 ± 0.3)
Tandem PFBCPZ:AITC/PBDB-TCl:AITC:BTP-eC9 80/130 2.03 12.5 77.6 19.7 (19.4 ± 0.2)
90/130 2.02 13.3 76.6 20.6 (20.2 ± 0.3)
90/130 2.02 13.2 76.0 20.3b
100/130 2.02 12.7 74.8 19.2 (18.7 ± 0.4)
90/120 2.03 12.8 77.1 20.0 (19.5 ± 0.3)
90/140 2.01 13.7 73.7 20.2 (19.7 ± 0.2)
80/130 2.03 12.5 77.6 19.7 (19.4 ± 0.2)
90/130 2.02 13.3 76.6 20.6 (20.2 ± 0.3)

aIntegrated current density based on EQE spectrum.

bAverage values with standard deviation are obtained from 10 devices.

cCertified by National Institute of Metrology, China (NIM, China).

Photophysical analysis

Femtosecond transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy is utilized to investigate the effect of AITC on the charge transfer dynamics in the ternary active layers. The 660 and 800 nm pulses are used to excite neat AITC and BTP-eC9 films, respectively. As shown in Fig. S3, the main TA signals are observed at 500–700 nm and 600–900 nm for AITC and BTP-eC9 films, respectively. These peaks arise from the main optical transition from the ground-state bleaching (GSB) signals that progressively decrease with delay time [31,32]. We measure the TA profiles of blend films and the data are shown in Fig. 2a–d. Here, an 800 nm excitation pump pulse is used to solely excite the BTP-eC9 acceptor to obtain the hole transfer signals. The decay dynamics at various wavelengths represent the different photophysical processes, as shown in Fig. 2e–f and Fig. S4. The signals at 575 and 750 nm are assigned to the GSB signals of PBDB-TCl and BTP-eC9, respectively. The decay trace at 950 nm is the photoinduced absorption of singlet excitons of the acceptor. Figure 2e and Fig. S4a show that the bleaching signals at 575 nm appear in the TA spectra with signal decay at 750 nm, which confirms the hole transfer process from acceptor to donor. The decay dynamics at 575 nm are selected as the characteristic signals and fitted by using biexponential functions for comparing the rates of hole transfer in the blends. As shown in Fig. 2f and Table S2, the τ1 and τ2 values of ternary films are both lower than that of binary films, which indicate more rapid hole transfer processes [13,33]. These results demonstrate that the addition of AITC promotes the rate of hole transfer, which is beneficial to suppress the bimolecular recombination probability and improve photovoltaic performance of the corresponding OSCs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Photophysical characteristics and charge transport dynamics. (a and b) 2D TA spectra of PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 under 800 nm excitation. (c and d) TA spectra at different time delays of PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 under the excitation wavelength of 800 nm. (e) Decay dynamics probed at 575, 750 and 950 nm in PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 systems under 800 nm excitation. (f) Decay dynamics probed at 575 nm in PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 systems under 800 nm excitation.

Analysis of device physics

The exciton dissociation probability (Pdiss) is calculated according to the previously established method [34,35]. Figure 3a shows the photocurrent (Jph) as a function of the effective voltage (Veff) of three OSCs. Consequently, the Pdiss of the three OSCs are 0.88, 0.96 and 0.93, respectively, which partially explains the improved FF in the ternary OSCs. In addition, to evaluate charge recombination kinetics, the charge carrier densities (n) and carrier lifetimes (τ) of the OSCs are calculated. As shown in Fig. S5 and Fig. 3b, the ternary devices exhibit higher n and τ along with lower recombination order (λ) compared to the binary OSCs, which indicates a mechanism close to an ideal bimolecular recombination, justified by the increased JSC and FF in ternary OSCs [36–38]. Based on n and τ, the biomolecular recombination rate constant (krec) can be calculated [37]. As shown in Fig. 3c, krec for the ternary device is still lower than that of the two binary devices, which indicates a significantly reduced bimolecular recombination loss, contributing to improved photoelectric properties of devices.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Device physics characterization. (a) Photocurrent (Jph) versus effective voltage (Veff) for three OSCs. (b and c) Charge lifetime (τ) and recombination rate coefficient (Rrec) as a function of charge density (n) of the binary and ternary OSCs; n and τ are calculated by transient photovoltage (TPV) and charge extraction (CE) measurements. (d) Carrier mobility of blend films. The hole, electron and bulk carrier mobility are obtained by the space charge limited current (SCLC) method [40] and photo-induced charge-carrier extraction at linearly increasing voltage (photo-CELIV) measurement [41]. (e) Electrochemical impedance spectra for three devices. The fitted lines are obtained by fitting based on equivalent circuit model shown in Fig. S8, where Rs, Rtrans and Rrec represent the series resistances from all contacting interfaces, transport resistance and recombination resistance of active layer. (f) Defects density of state of the three films and corresponding fitting results. (g) EQEEL curves of three OSCs. (h) Summarization of various voltage losses. (i) Plots of PCE against ΔVloss (OSCs with PCEs > 17% including this work).

The charge transport properties are further evaluated, as shown in Fig. 3d, Figs. S6–7 and Table S3. The hole and electron mobility of the three films are 3.01 × 10−4 and 3.89 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1 for PBDB-TCl : AITC, 5.37 × 10−4 and 5.40 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1 for PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9, 2.05 × 10−4 and 3.05 × 10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1 for PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9, respectively. On the other hand, the ternary films also show higher bulk carrier mobility in photo-CELIV measurements (Table S3). The higher and more balanced mobility in ternary films is helpful in improving FF and JSC. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements are also performed. As shown in Fig. 3e and Table S4, the ternary OSCs exhibit smaller Rs and Rtrans as well as larger Rrec, indicating promoted charge transport and restrained charge recombination, which is consistent with the improved FF and photovoltaic performance [33,39]. In addition, the electronic trap density of states (DoS) of OSCs are evaluated from the capacitance-frequency curves. As shown in Fig. 3f and Table S5, ternary OSCs show a smaller σ (0.027 eV) than that of binary OSCs (0.031 eV for PBDB-TCl : AITC and 0.028 eV for PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9), corresponding to the narrower distribution, which indicates the suppressed energetic disorder. Moreover, the center of the DoS (Et) of PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 are 0.22, 0.23 and 0.24 eV, respectively, which indicates that the addition of AITC gives rise to Et shifts slightly to HOMO direction in the ternary OSCs. Consequently, a high VOC of 0.88 V is obtained. These features can promote carrier transport since excitons and carriers trapped in the tail states of DoS are decreased, which can be ascribed to the growth of crystallites with better crystalline quality. The detailed morphology analysis will be discussed later.

Analysis of voltage losses

To probe the enhanced VOC in ternary OSCs, ΔVloss of three OSCs are obtained by EQEFTPS and EL spectra. The detailed processes are provided in Supporting Information (SI). The results of relevant characterizations and calculated parameters of ΔVloss are summarized in Fig. 3 and Table S6. The optical band gaps of OSCs (Egs, OSC) are determined to be 1.78, 1.38 and 1.38 eV, respectively (Fig. S10). The introduction of AITC into PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 does not improve the Eg. Moreover, ternary OSCs show a lower ΔVloss of 0.50 V than that of the PBDB-TCl : AITC (0.69 V) and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 (0.52 V) binary OSCs. Specifically, the unavoidable ΔV1 of the three devices are calculated to be 0.29, 0.26 and 0.26 V, respectively. Moreover, the ternary devices show a very low ΔV2 of 0.05 V, which can be attributed to the sharp band tail absorption dominated by low energetic disorder [8]. To verify this point, the energetic disorder in three OSCs is quantized by a parameter of Urbach energy. As shown in Fig. S11, the PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 film shows lower energetic disorder with an EU of 22.04 meV than that of PBDB-TCl : AITC (23.74 meV) and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 (22.67 meV). The variation of EU is consistent with that of ΔV2, which confirms that the lower energetic disorder (Fig. 3f) reduces ΔV2 in ternary OSCs.

To gain further insight into the composition of Vloss, EQEEL measurements of three devices are performed. As shown in Fig. 3g, the EQEEL values are 1.01 × 10−5 and 3.25 × 10−4 for the PBDB-TCl : AITC and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 binary OSCs, corresponding to ΔV3 of 0.34 and 0.21 V, respectively. For the ternary device, the EQEEL is measured as 7.68 × 10−4, corresponding to ΔV3 of 0.19 V. Therefore, compared with the PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 OSCs, the higher VOC of ternary OSC with similar Eg (1.38 eV) can be attributed to both mitigations in ΔV3 (from 0.21 to 0.19 V) and ΔV2 (from 0.06 to 0.05 V). The details of representative and efficient OSCs are summarized in Fig. 3i. In this work, the photovoltaic parameters of ternary OSCs are located in the overlap region with simultaneously high PCE and low ΔVloss. The above results indicate that pursuing high VOC while maintaining the JSC and FF values is still one of the most effective ways towards achieving high-performance OSCs.

Analysis of film morphology

To obtain more insights into the variation of photovoltaic performances in the ternary OSCs, the surface textures and aggregation of films are investigated by AFM. As shown in Fig. 4a and Fig. S12, PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 films exhibit surface roughness (Rq) of 1.84, 1.95 and 2.76 nm, respectively. The detailed phase separation of the films was then analyzed through the AFM phase images. Figure 4b shows the line profile FWHM of the peaks in the corresponding AFM phase images (Figure 4a). The derived average values of inter-fibril distance are 17.5, 20.1 and 23.4 nm for the PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 films, respectively. In addition, the power spectral density (PSD) analysis is conducted on the blend films to investigate quantitative information regarding domain properties [42,43]. The 1D PSD × q2 profiles as a function of spatial frequency (q) from the AFM phase images of the blends are provided in Fig. S13. It can be seen that the addition of AITC reduces the peak location of 1D-PSD(q), which means a decreased domain size. These results reveal that the introduction of AITC influences the molecular aggregation and phase separation of the ternary active layer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Morphology of thin films. (a) The atomic force microscopy (AFM) phase images of binary and ternary blended films. (b) Line profiles to obtain the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of cross-section of the fibral through AFM phase images. (c) 2D grazing incidence wide angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) patterns of the binary and ternary films. The qxy and qz corresponding scattering vector in the in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) directions. (d and e) OOP and IP line-cut profiles of the 2D GIWAXS patterns based on binary and ternary blended films.

GIWAXS is utilized to investigate the molecular orientation and crystallinity in the active layer thin films. First, the 2D GIWAXS patterns and corresponding 1D line cut profiles of neat films are shown in Figs. S14 and 15 and Table S7 in SI. All the films show face-on molecular orientations that are evidenced by the strong reflection of π–π stacking in the out-of-plane (OOP) directions. We further use Gaussian functions to differentiate and analyze the π–π stacking peaks, in order to obtain the information for peak area, FWHM and derived crystal coherence length (CCL) associated with the π–π stacking [44]. The face-on orientations with π–π stacking peaks at 1.70 Å−1 (d-spacing : 3.70 Å), 1.79 Å−1 (d-spacing : 3.50 Å) and 1.85 Å−1 (d-spacing : 3.40 Å) are observed for the PBDB-TCl, BTP-eC9 and AITC films, respectively. By fitting the π–π stacking peaks of all the neat films, the AITC film shows a CCL of 2.21 nm as opposed to that of PBDB-TCl (1.68 nm) and BTP-eC9 (1.96 nm), which is beneficial to the increased CCL in PBDB-TCl : AITC and PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 blends.

As shown in Fig. 4c–e, 2D GIWAXS and corresponding line-cut profiles of the blended films show the peaks near 0.30 Å−1 in the OOP directions, which are assigned to the diffraction of PBDB-TCl lamellar. In the IP directions, the peak near 0.30 Å−1, 0.33 Å−1 and 0.40 Å−1 are assigned to the diffraction of PBDB-TCl, AITC and BTP-eC9, respectively (Fig. S16 and Table S8). Moreover, PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 films show the π–π stacking located at 1.72 Å−1,1.77 Å−1 and 1.75 Å−1, respectively, corresponding to d-spacings of 3.65 Å, 3.54 Å and 3.59 Å (Fig. S17 and Table S9). The larger film thickness normalized-peak area (1.58) and CCLs (2.28 nm) than that of PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 film (1.23 and 2.22 nm) indicates that the introduction of AITC can reinforce molecular packing along with increased crystal size in PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 films. In addition, we analyze the relative population of crystallites of face-on and edge-on orientations relative to the substrate. The areas integrated with polar angle (θ) ranges of 0–45° (A1) and 45–90° (A2) are defined as the portion of edge-on and face-on crystallites, respectively, and the ratio of A2/A1 is regarded as the face-on to edge-on ratio [45]. As shown in Fig. S18, the A2/A1 of PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 and PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9 are 3.52, 5.16 and 4.65, respectively, which indicates that the introduction of AITC can increase the population of face-on crystallites of ternary film. These results account for improved and balanced carrier transport, suppressed charge recombination, decreased ΔVloss and improved device photovoltaic performance.

Performance of tandem OSCs

To explore the application potential of ternary active layers, the tandem devices are further fabricated. First, the wide bandgap polymer PFBCPZ is selected to blend with AITC as a bottom sub-cell active layer material to ensure the ideal match of current with top sub-cell [24,46]. The molecular structure, energy level and film absorbance spectra of PFBCPZ are shown in Fig. 5a and b and Fig. S19. The detailed photovoltaic parameters of the PFBCPZ : AITC-based single-junction OSCs are provided in Fig. S19 and Table S10. PFBCPZ : AITC OSCs exhibit a high VOC of 1.17 V, which is beneficial to achieving high photovoltaic parameters in tandem OSCs. The tandem OSCs are constructed by stacking inverted sub-cells (Fig. 5c). Subsequently, the optical field distribution within tandem devices is investigated by using the transfer-matrix modeling method [47]. As shown in Fig. 5c, the photon absorption rate distribution in the bottom sub-cell is primarily located in the wavelength range of 300–700 nm. The top cell absorbs radiation primarily located in the infrared region, at wavelengths of 700–1000 nm. Moreover, based on the optical distribution simulation and its integration over wavelength (Fig. S21a), a balanced and maximal theoretical value of over 18.9 mA cm−2 is obtained when the optimal thicknesses of the active layers in the bottom and top sub-cells are 90 and 150 nm (Fig. S21b), respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Photovoltaic performance of tandem OSCs. (a) Chemical structure of wide-bandgap polymer PFBCPZ. (b) Energy level diagram of the components used to fabricate tandem OSCs. (c) Distributions of photon absorptions of the tandem OSCs with glass/ITO structure (150 nm)/ZnO (30 nm)/PFBCPZ : AITC (90 nm)/MoO3 (7 nm)/Ag (0.5 nm)/ZnO-NPs : PFN-Br (20 nm)/PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 (130 nm)/MoO3(7 nm)/Ag (120 nm). (d) J-V curves of tandem OSCs with varying thickness of the active layer. (e) EQE spectra of optimal tandem OSC. (f and g) Light-intensity dependent JSC and VOC characteristics of the optimal tandem OSCs. (h) Photocurrent density (Jph) versus effective bias (Veff) for the tandem OSCs. (i) MPP tracking profile of the tandem OSCs.

Next, tandem OSCs were fabricated, and their photovoltaic performances are determined by measuring J−V curves under AM1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2 illumination. As shown in Fig. 5d and Table 1, the tandem OSCs produce a maximal current density of 13.7 mA cm−2 when the active layer thicknesses of the bottom and top sub-cells are controlled to 90 and 140 nm, which is almost identical with above simulations. By optimizing the thickness of the active layer in detail, the tandem OSCs containing active layer thicknesses of 90 and 130 nm in the bottom and top sub-cells, respectively, exhibit a VOC of 2.02 V, JSC of 13.3 mA cm−2, FF of 76.6% and a PCE of 20.6% (verified as 20.3% by NIM, China, as shown in Fig. S22 and Table 1), which is the highest value for OSCs. The top sub-cell containing the ternary active layer shows a broad EQE spectrum with a high response <80% in the range of 750–900 nm. The JSC values of tandem OSCs are verified by the calculated current density (Jcal.) from the EQE spectra in Fig. 5e. The Jcal. values of bottom and top sub-cells are 13.3 and 13.2 mA cm−2, respectively, indicating the highly balanced current generation in each sub-cell. Besides, the Jcal’s obtained by EQE spectra are similar to the JSC derived from J−V curves (deviations lower than 1%), which further confirm that the measurements are accurate.

To further investigate the charge recombination and photoelectrical properties of the tandem OSCs, the J−V curves of the device are measured under various light intensities (Plight), and the results are shown in Fig. 5f. As shown in Table S12, the PCEs of the tandem OSCs remain at 17.8% when the Plight varies from 100 to 10 mW cm−2. Moreover, the JSC of the tandem OSCs follows a power-law dependence with respect to Plight (Fig. 5g), and the slope value is 0.97, which suggests no substantial space charge build-up in both the two sub-cells and the interconnecting layer of the tandem OSCs [48]. The dependence of VOC and FF on Plight are shown in Fig. 5g, respectively. The FF of the tandem devices increases under low light intensity (50 mW cm−2), which is due to weak charge recombination in the active layer. The VOC increases with the light intensity, which is similar to that in other reported single-junction OSCs. Clearly, these results indicate that the superior tandem OSCs are constructed by using two well performing sub-cells and an effective interconnecting layer. The charge dissociation property of tandem OSCs is studied by measuring the relationship between the photocurrent density and effective bias. As shown in Fig. 5h, the photocurrents are saturated at large reverse biases, which indicates that all the charge carriers are dissociated and collected at the electrodes. Consequently, the Pdiss of tandem OSCs is determined to be 95.3%. As the overall Pdiss of the tandem cell is much larger than the reference organic solar cell, it suggests that the intrinsic Pdiss of the organic sub-cell is improved. Then, the operational stability of the tandem OSCs is also investigated under continuous light illumination by using maximum power point (MPP) tracking measurements. Figure 5i shows the time dependence of the normalized PCE of the devices. The best tandem OSC shows 4% degradation of initial PCE within 1380 s exposure. These results illustrate that PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9–based tandem OSCs exhibit outstanding operational stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, a tandem OSC with 20.6% PCE is achieved, which is featured by a ΔVloss-restraining multicomponent active layer containing polymer PBDB-TCl and two small molecule acceptors AITC and BTP-eC9. Benefiting from the unique morphology of the ternary active layer, efficient charge generation, improved carrier migration and reduced voltage loss (0.50 V) are realized. Hence the PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 ternary OSCs achieved a PCE of 19.1% (certified as 18.9%) by simultaneously increasing the open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current and fill factor. In addition, the tandem OSCs based on the PFBCPZ : AITC bottom active layer and the PM6 : AITC : BTP-eC9 top active layer yielded a record PCE of 20.6% (certified as 20.3%), which is the highest PCE in OSCs field. Overall, this work not only reports an outstanding PCE but also demonstrates that decreasing the voltage losses, and adopting ternary and tandem device structures are effective strategies for further improving the efficiency of the OSCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

The synthesis and purification of PFBCPZ and AITC were reported in our previous report [24,46]. PBDB-TCl, BTP-eC9, PNDIT-F3N-Br were purchased from Solarmer Materials Inc. and used as received. PEDOT : PSS (clevios P VP Al 4083) was purchased from H.C. Starck Co. Ltd. The glass/ITO substrates were purchased from Huananxiangcheng Inc.

Fabrication of single-junction OSCs

Glass/indium-tin-oxide (ITO) substrates were sequentially cleaned in detergent, deionized water, acetone and isopropanol, respectively. ITO substrates were treated with ultraviolet-ozone (UVO) for 15 min, and then PEDOT : PSS solution was spin-coated on the ITO substrates. The PEDOT : PSS-coated ITO substrates were annealed at 160°C for 15 min under air atmosphere. Active layers were obtained by spin-coating the blend solutions on the PEDOT : PSS layers with a thickness of ∼100 nm. Active layer materials were dissolved in chloroform at a polymer concentration of 7.5 mg mL−1. The weight ratio of donor to acceptor was fixed at 1 : 1.2 for PBDB-TCl : AITC, PBDB-TCl : BTP-eC9, and PFBCPZ : AITC and at 1 : 0.2 : 1.2 for PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9. All the solutions were stirred at 40°C for 4 h. Before spin-coating the active layer, 0.5% 1,8-diiodooctane (v/v) was added to the solutions. The active layers were annealed at 100°C for 10 min. Then, a 5 nm-thick layer of PNDIT-F3N-Br was spin-coated on the top of the active layers. Finally, a 150 nm layer of Ag was deposited by thermal evaporation through shadow masks, leading to a defined active area of 0.09 cm2. The area of the aperture was 0.0625 cm−2.

Fabrication of tandem OSCs

Glass/ITO substrates were cleaned and treated with UVO according to the abovementioned methods. PEDOT : PSS was spin-coated on top of ITO substrates, followed by 15 min annealing at 160°C. After annealing, the PEDOT : PSS coated ITO substrates were transferred into an N2 glove box. Then, the PFBCPZ : AITC solution was spin-coated, followed by annealing at 110°C for 10 min. Then, 7 nm MoOx layer and 0.5 nm ultra-thin Ag layer were evaporated under high vacuum. Subsequently, ZnO : PFN-Br solution was cast on the bottom cells and annealed at 110°C for 30 min. After that, the solution of PBDB-TCl : AITC : BTP-eC9 was spin-coated to obtain films with different thicknesses, and then the active layers were thermally annealed at 110°C for 10 min. Finally, 7 nm MoOx and 120 nm Ag layers were thermally evaporated under high vacuum (3 × 10−4 Pa). The area of cells, defined by the overlap between the ITO and Ag electrodes, was 0.037 mm2. The area of the aperture was 0.0225 cm2.

Supplementary Material

nwad085_Supplemental_File

Contributor Information

Jianqiu Wang, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Materials, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Novel Semiconductor-optoelectronics Materials and Devices, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.

Zhong Zheng, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Biology Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Pengqing Bi, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Zhihao Chen, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.

Yafei Wang, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Xiaoyu Liu, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Biology Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Shaoqing Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Biology Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Xiaotao Hao, School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.

Maojie Zhang, Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Materials, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Novel Semiconductor-optoelectronics Materials and Devices, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China.

Yongfang Li, Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Materials, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Novel Semiconductor-optoelectronics Materials and Devices, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Organic Solids, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Jianhui Hou, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Biology Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

FUNDING

J.H. would like to acknowledge financial support from the Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2019B030302007), and the ‘Dual Carbon’ Science and Technology Innovation of Jiangsu Province (Industrial Prospect and Key Technology Research Program) (BE2022021). M.Z. would like to acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51773142 and 51973146), the Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (BK20190099), the Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology, and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. Z.Z. would like to acknowledge financial support from the NSFC (51703041). J.W. and Z.Z. would like to acknowledge financial support from the Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences Junior Fellow.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

J.W., Z.Z., M.Z. and J.H conceived the idea. J.W. designed and conducted the experiments. Z.Z., P.B., Y.W. and X.L. helped to conduct the experiments and took part in the discussion. Z.C., P.B. and X.H. performed the TA measurements. S.Z. and M.Z. provided the materials. J.W. wrote the initial manuscript. Z.Z., M.Z., Y.L. and J.H. revised the paper.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Søndergaard R, Hösel M, Angmo Det al. . Roll-to-roll fabrication of polymer solar cells. Mater Today 2012; 15: 36–49. 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70019-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ameri T, Li N, Brabec CJ. Highly efficient organic tandem solar cells: a follow up review. Energy Environ Sci 2013; 6: 2390–413. 10.1039/c3ee40388b [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jinno H, Fukuda K, Xu Xet al. . Stretchable and waterproof elastomer-coated organic photovoltaics for washable electronic textile applications. Nat Energy 2017; 2: 780–5. 10.1038/s41560-017-0001-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dong S, Jia T, Zhang Ket al. . Single-component non-halogen solvent-processed high-performance organic solar cell module with efficiency over 14%. Joule 2020; 4: 2004–16. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zheng Z, Wang J, Bi Pet al. . Tandem organic solar cell with 20.2% efficiency. Joule 2022; 6: 171–84. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.12.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhu L, Zhang M, Xu Jet al. . Single-junction organic solar cells with over 19% efficiency enabled by a refined double-fibril network morphology. Nat Mater 2022; 21: 656–63. 10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Green MA, Dunlop ED, Hohl-Ebinger Jet al. . Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 60). Prog Photovolt Res Appl 2022; 30: 687–701. 10.1002/pip.3595 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Liu S, Yuan J, Deng Wet al. . High-efficiency organic solar cells with low non-radiative recombination loss and low energetic disorder. Nat Photonics 2020; 14: 300–5. 10.1038/s41566-019-0573-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yao J, Kirchartz T, Vezie MSet al. . Quantifying losses in open-circuit voltage in solution-processable solar cells. Phys Rev Appl 2015; 4: 014020. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.014020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hou J, Inganas O, Friend RHet al. . Organic solar cells based on non-fullerene acceptors. Nat Mater 2018; 17: 119–28. 10.1038/nmat5063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Benduhn J, Tvingstedt K, Piersimoni Fet al. . Intrinsic non-radiative voltage losses in fullerene-based organic solar cells. Nat Energy 2017; 2: 17053. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.53 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen XK, Qian D, Wang Yet al. . A unified description of non-radiative voltage losses in organic solar cells. Nat Energy 2021; 6: 799–806. 10.1038/s41560-021-00843-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bi P, Zhang S, Chen Zet al. . Reduced non-radiative charge recombination enables organic photovoltaic cell approaching 19% efficiency. Joule 2021; 5: 2408–19. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhan L, Li S, Li Yet al. . Desired open-circuit voltage increase enables efficiencies approaching 19% in symmetric-asymmetric molecule ternary organic photovoltaics. Joule 2022; 6: 662–75. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Craciun NI, Wildeman J, Blom PWM. Universal arrhenius temperature activated charge transport in diodes from disordered organic semiconductors. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 056601. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.056601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Garcia-Belmonte G, Boix PP, Bisquert Jet al. . Influence of the intermediate density-of-states occupancy on open-circuit voltage of bulk heterojunction solar cells with different fullerene acceptors. J Phys Chem Lett 2010; 1: 2566–71. 10.1021/jz100956d [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li C, Zhou JD, Song JLet al. . Non-fullerene acceptors with branched side chains and improved molecular packing to exceed 18% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nat Energy 2021; 6: 605–13. 10.1038/s41560-021-00820-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rau U. Reciprocity relation between photovoltaic quantum efficiency and electroluminescent emission of solar cells. Phys Rev B 2007; 76: 085303. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.085303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Qian D, Zheng Z, Yao Het al. . Design rules for minimizing voltage losses in high-efficiency organic solar cells. Nat Mater 2018; 17: 703–9. 10.1038/s41563-018-0128-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Yoshikawa K, Kawasaki H, Yoshida Wet al. . Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat Energy 2017; 2: 17032. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.32 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cui Y, Yao H, Hong Let al. . Achieving over 15% efficiency in organic photovoltaic cells via copolymer design. Adv Mater 2019; 31: 1808356. 10.1002/adma.201808356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yuan J, Zhang Y, Zhou Let al. . Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule 2019; 3: 1140–51. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cui Y, Xu Y, Yao Het al. . Single-junction organic photovoltaic cell with 19% efficiency. Adv Mater 2021; 33: 2102420. 10.1002/adma.202102420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang J, Zhang M, Lin Jet al. . An asymmetric wide-bandgap acceptor simultaneously enabling highly efficient single-junction and tandem organic solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 2022; 15: 1585–93. 10.1039/D1EE03673D [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang J, Zheng Z, Zu Yet al. . A tandem organic photovoltaic cell with 19.6% efficiency enabled by light distribution control. Adv Mater 2021; 33: 2102787. 10.1002/adma.202102787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tamura H, Burghardt I. Ultrafast charge separation in organic photovoltaics enhanced by charge delocalization and vibronically hot exciton dissociation. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135: 16364–7. 10.1021/ja4093874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chong K, Xu X, Meng Het al. . Realizing 19.05% efficiency polymer solar cells by progressively improving charge extraction and suppressing charge recombination. Adv Mater 2022; 34: 2109516. 10.1002/adma.202109516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Cai Y, Li Y, Wang Ret al. . A well-mixed phase formed by two compatible non-fullerene acceptors enables ternary organic solar cells with efficiency over 18.6%. Adv Mater 2021; 33: 2101733. 10.1002/adma.202101733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. He C, Pan Y, Ouyang Yet al. . Manipulating the D:a interfacial energetics and intermolecular packing for 19.2% efficiency organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ Sci 2022; 15: 2537–44. 10.1039/D2EE00595F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sun R, Wu Y, Yang Xet al. . Single-junction organic solar cells with 19.17% efficiency enabled by introducing one asymmetric guest acceptor. Adv Mater 2022; 34: 2110147. 10.1002/adma.202110147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hu K, Du J, Zhu Cet al. . Chlorinated polymerized small molecule acceptor enabling ternary all-polymer solar cells with over 16.6% efficiency. Sci China Chem 2022; 65: 954–63. 10.1007/s11426-022-1219-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wang J, Xu J, Yao Net al. . A comparative study on hole transfer inversely correlated with driving force in two non-fullerene organic solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 2019; 10: 4110–6. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang M, Zhu L, Hao Tet al. . High-efficiency organic photovoltaics using eutectic acceptor fibrils to achieve current amplification. Adv Mater 2021; 33: 2007177. 10.1002/adma.202007177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Blom PWM, Mihailetchi VD, Koster LJAet al. . Device physics of polymer:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 1551–66. 10.1002/adma.200601093 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li Z, Ying L, Zhu Pet al. . A generic green solvent concept boosting the power conversion efficiency of all-polymer solar cells to 11%. Energy Environ Sci 2019; 12: 157–63. 10.1039/C8EE02863J [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Gasparini N, Jiao X, Heumueller Tet al. . Designing ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with reduced carrier recombination and a fill factor of 77%. Nat Energy 2016; 1: 16118. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Guo X, Zhou N, Lou SJet al. . Polymer solar cells with enhanced fill factors. Nat Photon 2013; 7: 825–33. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Liang RZ, Zhang Y, Savikhin Vet al. . Higher mobility and carrier lifetimes in solution-processable small-molecule ternary solar cells with 11% efficiency. Adv Energy Mater 2019; 9: 1802836. 10.1002/aenm.201802836 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ma X, Zeng A, Gao Jet al. . Approaching 18% efficiency of ternary organic photovoltaics with wide bandgap polymer donor and well compatible Y6:Y6-1O as acceptor. Natl Sci Rev 2021; 8: nwaa305. 10.1093/nsr/nwaa305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Blom PWM, de Jong MJM, van Munster MG. Electric-field and temperature dependence of the hole mobility in poly(p-phenylene vinylene). Phys Rev B 1997; 55: R656–9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R656 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Stephen M, Genevičius K, Juška Get al. . Charge transport and its characterization using photo-CELIV in bulk heterojunction solar cells. Polym Int 2017; 66: 13–25. 10.1002/pi.5274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Lee C, Yi A, Kim HJet al. . Nonfullerene small molecules-enabled high-performance organic photovoltaics for indoor energy harvesting. Adv Energy Sustain Res 2021; 2: 2100041. 10.1002/aesr.202100041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lee C, Lee JH, Lee HHet al. . Over 30% efficient indoor organic photovoltaics enabled by morphological modification using two compatible non-fullerene acceptors. Adv Energy Mater 2022; 12: 2200275. 10.1002/aenm.202200275 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Song J, Zhang M, Yuan Met al. . Morphology characterization of bulk heterojunction solar cells. Small Methods 2018; 2: 1700229. 10.1002/smtd.201700229 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Li S, Ye L, Zhao Wet al. . Design of a new small-molecule electron acceptor enables efficient polymer solar cells with high fill factor. Adv Mater 2017; 29: 1704051. 10.1002/adma.201704051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Wu J, Fan Q, Xiong Met al. . Carboxylate substituted pyrazine: a simple and low-cost building block for novel wide bandgap polymer donor enables 15.3% efficiency in organic solar cells. Nano Energy 2021; 82: 105679. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105679 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Xia R, Brabec CJ, Yip HLet al. . High-throughput optical screening for efficient semitransparent organic solar cells. Joule 2019; 3: 2241–54. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. You J, Dou L, Yoshimura Ket al. . A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 1446. 10.1038/ncomms2411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwad085_Supplemental_File

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES