Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dual Diagn. 2022 Dec 30;19(1):3–15. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2022.2160037

Table 3.

Standardized Regression Coefficients: Indirect Effect Models

Y Model Model R2 β p Bootstrapped 95% CI
AUDIT PCL-5 → DERS (a) .18** .37 <.001 .27 .46
DERS → AUDIT (b) .19** .11 <.001 .06 .15
PCL-5 → AUDIT (c) .11* .06 .001 .02 .09
PCL-5 → AUDIT (c’) .02 .30 -.02 .06
PCL-5 → DERS → AUDIT (a*b) .04 .02 .06
DMQ-R-SF: Coping motives subscale PCL-5 → DERS (a) .27** .32 <.001 .22 .41
DERS →DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (b) .39* .02 .004 .01 .04
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (c) .37* .02 .001 .01 .03
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (c’) .01 .04 .001 .03
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (a*b) .01 .002 .01
DMQ-R-SF: Enhancement motives subscale PCL-5 → DERS (a) .29** .29 <.001 .19 .39
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (b) .46 .01 .23 −.005 .02
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (c) .46 .002 .65 −.008 .01
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (c’) .0001 .98 −.01 .01
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (a*b) .002 −.002 .01
DMQ-R-SF: Conformity motives subscale PCL-5 → DERS (a) .28** .30 <.001 .20 .40
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (b) .26* .02 .008 .01 .04
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (c) .24 .01 .084 −.001 .02
PCL-5 →DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (c’) .004 .48 −.01 .02
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (a*b) .01 .002 .01
DMQ-R-SF: Social motives subscale PCL-5 → DERS (a) .30** .29 <.001 .19 .38
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (b) .38 −.0001 .99 −.02 .02
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (c) .38 −.01 .30 −.02 .01
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (c’) −.01 .33 −.02 .01
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (a*b) .00 −.005 .01

Note.

**

p < .001

*

p <.05.

The standard error and 95% CI for a*b are obtained using the bootstrapping technique with 5000 resamples. PCL-5 (PTSD symptom severity) is the predictor in all models. DERS (emotion regulation difficulties) is the indirect predictor in all models. CI (lower) is the lower bound of a 95% CI; CI (upper) is the upper bound of a 95% CI. Path a indicates effect of X on M; b, effect of M on Y controlling for X; c, effect of X on Y; c’, direct effect of X on Y, controlling for M. All total, direct, and indirect paths are noted after controlling for the variance accounted for by theoretically relevant covariates. Model 1 includes trauma load; the remaining models include trauma load and alternate alcohol use motives. PCL-5 = PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; DERS = Brief Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; DMQ-R-SF = Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised Short Form.