Table 3.
Standardized Regression Coefficients: Indirect Effect Models
Y | Model | Model R2 | β | p | Bootstrapped | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUDIT | PCL-5 → DERS (a) | .18** | .37 | <.001 | .27 | .46 |
DERS → AUDIT (b) | .19** | .11 | <.001 | .06 | .15 | |
PCL-5 → AUDIT (c) | .11* | .06 | .001 | .02 | .09 | |
PCL-5 → AUDIT (c’) | .02 | .30 | -.02 | .06 | ||
PCL-5 → DERS → AUDIT (a*b) | .04 | .02 | .06 | |||
DMQ-R-SF: Coping motives subscale | PCL-5 → DERS (a) | .27** | .32 | <.001 | .22 | .41 |
DERS →DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (b) | .39* | .02 | .004 | .01 | .04 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (c) | .37* | .02 | .001 | .01 | .03 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (c’) | .01 | .04 | .001 | .03 | ||
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Coping motives subscale (a*b) | .01 | .002 | .01 | |||
DMQ-R-SF: Enhancement motives subscale | PCL-5 → DERS (a) | .29** | .29 | <.001 | .19 | .39 |
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (b) | .46 | .01 | .23 | −.005 | .02 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (c) | .46 | .002 | .65 | −.008 | .01 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (c’) | .0001 | .98 | −.01 | .01 | ||
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Enhancement motives subscale (a*b) | .002 | −.002 | .01 | |||
DMQ-R-SF: Conformity motives subscale | PCL-5 → DERS (a) | .28** | .30 | <.001 | .20 | .40 |
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (b) | .26* | .02 | .008 | .01 | .04 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (c) | .24 | .01 | .084 | −.001 | .02 | |
PCL-5 →DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (c’) | .004 | .48 | −.01 | .02 | ||
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Conformity motives subscale (a*b) | .01 | .002 | .01 | |||
DMQ-R-SF: Social motives subscale | PCL-5 → DERS (a) | .30** | .29 | <.001 | .19 | .38 |
DERS → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (b) | .38 | −.0001 | .99 | −.02 | .02 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (c) | .38 | −.01 | .30 | −.02 | .01 | |
PCL-5 → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (c’) | −.01 | .33 | −.02 | .01 | ||
PCL-5 → DERS → DMQ-R-SF Social motives subscale (a*b) | .00 | −.005 | .01 |
Note.
p < .001
p <.05.
The standard error and 95% CI for a*b are obtained using the bootstrapping technique with 5000 resamples. PCL-5 (PTSD symptom severity) is the predictor in all models. DERS (emotion regulation difficulties) is the indirect predictor in all models. CI (lower) is the lower bound of a 95% CI; CI (upper) is the upper bound of a 95% CI. Path a indicates effect of X on M; b, effect of M on Y controlling for X; c, effect of X on Y; c’, direct effect of X on Y, controlling for M. All total, direct, and indirect paths are noted after controlling for the variance accounted for by theoretically relevant covariates. Model 1 includes trauma load; the remaining models include trauma load and alternate alcohol use motives. PCL-5 = PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; DERS = Brief Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; DMQ-R-SF = Drinking Motives Questionnaire Revised Short Form.