Table 4.
Demographics, CUP classification and genomic results of 14 patients treated with targeted therapy.
| Age | Sex | CUP subtype | CUP subtype detail | Molecular target identified | Molecular target detail | Targeted therapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | M | Favourable | Renal-like | No | — | Pazopanib |
| 59 | M | Favourable | Lung-like | Yes | EGFR exon 18 mutation | Erlotinib |
| 63 | M | Favourable | Colon-like | No | — | Regorafenib |
| 56 | F | Favourable | Breast-like | Yes | ERBB2 amplification | Trastuzumab and pertuzumab |
| 73 | F | Favourable | Breast-like | Yes | ERBB2 amplification | Trastuzumab and pertuzumab |
| 60 | F | Unfavourable | — | Yes | MYC amplification | BET inhibitor |
| 70 | M | Unfavourable | — | Yes | BRCA2 mutation | Talazoparib |
| 64 | F | Unfavourable | — | No | — | Pazopanib |
| 69 | F | Favourable | Renal-like | No | — | Pazopanib |
| 64 | M | Unfavourable | — | Yes | CDK3 mutation | Ribociclib and trametinib |
| 71 | M | Favourable | Renal-like | No | — | Pazopanib |
| 24 | F | Unfavourable | — | Yes | PIK3CA and PTEN alterations | Ipatasertib |
| 48 | M | Unfavourable | — | Yes | BRAF mutation | Vemurafenib |
| 39 | F | Unfavourable | — | Yes | ERBB2 amplification | Trastuzumab, Ado-trastuzumab emtansine |
BET Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal motif.