Table 5.

Patterns of neighbourhood social deprivation between 1996 and recruitment and prostate cancer risk, overall and by cancer aggressiveness.

			Model 1 Age only		Model 2a Fully adjusted		Model 3b Fully adjusted + personal factors of social isolation
	n Co	n Ca	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Overall
Social deprivation index patterns
Low–Low	484	426	1	Reference	1	Reference	1	Reference
High–Low	161	206	1.44	1.13–1.83	1.42	1.11–1.81	1.41	1.10–1.80
Low–High	136	161	1.28	0.99–1.67	1.23	0.94–1.60	1.17	0.89–1.53
High–High	455	532	1.37	1.14–1.64	1.32	1.09–1.59	1.31	1.08–1.59
Low grade
Social deprivation index patterns
Low–Low	484	343	1	Reference	Reference		1	Reference
High–Low	161	165	1.42	1.10–1.84	1.40	1.08–1.82	1.39	1.07–1.79
Low–High	136	122	1.21	0.92–1.60	1.17	0.88–1.55	1.11	0.84–1.47
High–High	455	398	1.28	1.06–1.55	1.26	1.03–1.54	1.27	1.05–1.54
High grade
Social deprivation index patterns
Low–Low	484	83	1	Reference	1	Reference	1	Reference
High–Low	161	40	1.46	0.97–2.20	1.44	0.95–2.18	1.44	0.96–2.18
Low–High	136	39	1.57	1.03–2.40	1.46	0.95–2.24	1.40	0.92–2.14
High–High	455	132	1.70	1.26–2.30	1.52	1.11–2.08	1.43	1.06–1.92

PROtEuS, Montreal, Canada, 2005–2012.

^aModel 2: adjusted for age, ancestry, family income at index date, highest level of education and neighbourhood material deprivation.

^bModel 3: Model 2 + adjusted for marital status, number of children, number of siblings, number of persons living with the subject 2 years before the index date.