Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;315(6):1675–1688. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02565-x

Table 3.

MacDonald Hull and Norris grading for individual lesions among patients of different groups before and after treatment

MacDonald Hull and Norris grading Group A
N` = 40
Group B
N` = 62
Group C
N` = 45
Group D
N` = 38
Total
N` = 185
p1a p2a p3a p4a p5a p6a p7c
Baseline
G0 18 (45%) 39(62.9%) 30(66.6%) 17(44.7%) 104(56.2%)
G1 12 (30%) 15(24.2) 7(15.6%) 9(23.7%) 43(23.3%)
G2 10 (25%) 7(11.3%) 7(15.6%) 8(21.1%) 32(17.3%)
G3 0 (0%) 1 (1.6%) 1(2.2%) 4(10.5%) 6(3.2%)
G4 0 (0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%)

Mean

SD

0.8

0.82

0.52

0.76

0.53

0.84

0.97

1.05

0.67

0.87

0.09 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.09
After treatment
G0 2 (5%) 5 (8.1%) 1(2.2%) 2(5.3%) 11(5.9%)
G1 5(12.5%) 4 (6.4%) 4(8.9%) 4(10.5%) 15(8.1%)
G2 2(5%) 5 (8.1%) 6(13.3%) 4(10.5%) 14(7.6%)
G3 10(25%) 9 (14.5%) 9(20%) 3(7.9%) 32(17.3%)
G4 21(52.5%) 39(62.9%) 25(55.6%) 25(65.8%) 113(61.1%)

Mean

SD

3.0.08

1.24

3.18

1.3

3.18

1.11

3.16

1.29

3.16

1.23

0.4 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.7
p value ∞ 0.00001* b 0.00001* b 0.00001* b 0.00001* b 0.00001* b

N` = number of lesions in each group. Mann–Whitney testa, Wilcoxon test b; Kruskal–Wallis testc, p value ∞ (baseline & post-treatment MacDonald Hull and Norris grade), p1(A,B), p2(A,C), p3(A,D), p4(B,C), p5(B,D), p6(C,D), p7(A,B,C,D)

*Statistical significance