Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;315(6):1675–1688. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02565-x

Table 4.

Trichoscopic features’ frequencies among patients of the four groups before and after treatment

Trichoscopic features Group A
n = 19
Group B
n = 16
Group C
n = 15
Group D
n = 14
Total P1b P2b P3b P4b P5b P6b P7c
YD 1 11 (57.9%) 10 (62.5%) 9(60%) 9(64.3%) 39(60.9%) 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
YD 2 2 (10.5%) 3 (6.25%) 2 (13.33%) 2(14.3%) 9(14%) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
p value∞ a 0.004* 0.01* 0.01* 0.01* 0.001*
BD 1 10 (52.6%) 8 (50%) 8 (53.3%) 9(64.3%) 35(54.6%) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8
BD 2 1 (5.2%) 0 0 (0%) 1 (7.1%) 2(3.1%) 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5
p value∞ a 0.004* 0.004* 0.008* 0.008* 0.001*
BH 1 9 (47.4%) 7 (43.75%) 7 (46.67%) 6 (42.9%) 29(45.3%) 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
BH 2 0 0 0 0 0
p value∞ a 0.004* 0.01* 0.01* 0.03* 0.001*
EMH 1 6 (31.6%) 9 (56.25%) 10(66.67%) 8(57.1%) 33(51.5%) 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1
EMH 2 0 1 (6.25%) 3 (20%) 2 (14.3%) 6(9.3%) 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.2
p value∞ a 0.03* 0.008* 0.01* 0.03* 0.001*
SVH 1 9(47.4%) 10 (62.5%) 7 (46.67%) 8 (57.1%) 34(53.1%) 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7
SVH 2 10(52.6%) 12 (75%) 8 (53.3%) 10(71.4%) 40(62.5%) 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.2
p value∞ a 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.3
Terminal hair 1 3 1 1 1 6 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.2
Terminal hair 2 14(73.7%) 13(81.25%) 12(80%) 12(85.7%) 51(79.6%) 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
p value ∞ a 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* 0.001* 0.0001*

1: Before treatment, 2: After treatment, YD yellow dots, BD black dots, BH broken hairs, EMH exclamation mark hairs, SVH short vellus hair; Mc-Nemartesta; Chi-square testb, Kruskal–Wallis testc, p value ∞ (before &after treatment). P1(A&B), P2(A&C), P3(A&D), P4(B&C), P5(B&D), P6(C&D), P7,(A,B,C &D)

*Statistical significance