TABLE 3.
Comparison of state- and urbanicity-specific estimates of dementia prevalence to those of prior studies
| Authors | Year | Geographic location, state |
Age | Sample size |
Diagnostic criteria |
Prevalence | 95% CI | Diff (P < 0.05) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban | ||||||||
| Vas et al.29 | 2001 | Mumbai, Maharashtra | 65+ | 24,488 | DSM-IV | 2.3 | 1.8–2.8 | |
| Shaji et al.31 | 2005 | Ernakulam, Kerala | 65+ | 1934 | DSM-IV | 3.4 | 2.7–4.1 | * |
| Das et al.32 | 2006 | Kolkata, West Bengal | 60+ | 5430 | DSM-IV | 1.0 | 0.8–1.3 | * |
| Rodriguez et al.36 | 2008 | Chennai, Tamil Nadu | 65+ | 1005 | DSM-IV | 0.9 | 0.3–1.5 | * |
| 10/66 dementia | 7.5 | 5.8–9.1 | ||||||
| Mathuranath et al.37 | 2010 | Trivandrum, Kerala | 65+ | 1672 | DSM-IV | 4.9 | 3.8–5.9 | |
| Seby etal.38 | 2011 | Pune, Maharashtra | 65+ | 202 | ICD-10 | 14.9 | NR | |
| Banerjee et al.33 | 2017 | Kolkata, West Bengal | 50+ | 17,584 | DSM-IV | 1.3 | 1.1–1.6 | * |
| LASI | 2017–2020 | All India | 60+ | 10,756 | CDR>=1 | 5.3 | 4.3–6.4 | |
| Kerala | 60+ | 570 | CDR>=1 | 7.8 | 4.6–11.0 | |||
| Maharashtra | 60+ | 848 | CDR>=1 | 5.0 | 2.7–7.4 | |||
| Tamil Nadu | 60+ | 871 | CDR>=1 | 4.1 | 2.3–6.0 | |||
| West Bengal | 60+ | 776 | CDR>=1 | 5.6 | 3.6–7.7 | |||
| Rural | ||||||||
| Shaji et al.39 | 1996 | Ernakulam, Kerala | 60+ | 2067 | DSM-IIIR | 3.2 | Not Reported | |
| Rajkumar et al.30 | 1997 | Thiroporur, Tamil Nadu | 60+ | 750 | ICD-10 | 3.5 | 2.2–4.8 | |
| Chandra et al.34 | 1998 | Ballabgarh, Haryana | 65+ | 3869 | DSM-IV, CDR > = 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.0–1.9 | * |
| Rodriguez et al.36 | 2008 | Vellore, Tamil Nadu | 65+ | 999 | DSM-IV | 0.8 | 0.2–1.3 | * |
| 10/66 dementia | 10.6 | 8.6–12.6 | ||||||
| Tiwari et al.35 | 2013 | Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh | 60+ | 2146 | ICD-10 | 2.8 | 2.0–3.9 | * |
| Gurukartick et al.40 | 2016 | Villupuram district, Tamil Nadu | 65+ | 1300 | DSM-IV | 3.1 | NR | |
| LASI | 2017–2020 | All India | 60+ | 20,721 | CDR>=1 | 8.4 | 7.1–9.6 | |
| Haryana | 60+ | 600 | CDR>=1 | 6.2 | 3.5–8.8 | |||
| Kerala | 60+ | 640 | CDR>=1 | 8.7 | 5.0–12.4 | |||
| Tamil Nadu | 60+ | 663 | CDR>=1 | 7.8 | 4.6–11.0 | |||
| Uttar Pradesh | 60+ | 1740 | CDR>=1 | 8.4 | 6.2–10.7 |
Note:
Indicates prior study’s estimate is outside of the 95% CI of the state- and urbanicity-specific estimates from LASI.
Abbreviations: CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating;19 CI, confidence interval; DSM-IV, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition;43 DSM-IIIR, Psychiatry Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition Revised;41 ICD-10, International Classification of Disease, the 10th revision;42 LASI, Longitudinal Aging Study in India; NR, not reported; 10/66 dementia, the 10/66 dementia algorithm.44