Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 29;17:1191091. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1191091

Table 2.

Standard model of logistic regression presenting the probability of migraine prevalence in adults.

Effect Nagelkerke R2 = 0.11
Coefficient Standard error Wald value OR 95% CI for OR p
Mother’s education level: Master’s course graduates1 −0.210 0.210 0.999 0.64 0.30–1.37 0.317
Mother’s education level: Secondary education or Bachelor’s course graduates1 −0.024 0.175 0.018 0.77 0.40–1.48 0.892
Father’s education level: Master’s course graduates1 0.361 0.213 2.867 1.60 0.75–3.42 0.090
Father’s education level: Secondary education or Bachelor’s course graduates1 −0.251 0.180 1.948 0.87 0.45–1.67 0.163
Maternal smoking (MSDP): yes2 0.632 0.313 4.091 3.62 1.52–8.64 0.043
Maternal smoking (MSDP): do not know2 0.023 0.320 0.005 1.97 0.80–4.84 0.943
Maternal passive smoking (MPSDP): yes2 0.039 0.221 0.032 1.44 0.91–2.27 0.859
Maternal passive smoking (MPSDP): do not know2 0.286 0.381 0.564 1.84 0.59–5.80 0.453
Alcohol consumption: yes2 0.555 0.507 1.199 1.78 0.41–7.74 0.274
Alcohol consumption: do not know2 −0.533 0.369 2.084 0.60 0.25–1.44 0.149
Traumatic event: yes2 0.473 0.216 4.803 2.12 1.15–3.90 0.028
Traumatic event: do not know2 −0.196 0.219 0.797 1.09 0.58–2.03 0.372
1

vs primary or vocational education.

2

vs no.

OR, odds ratio; p, probability; Wald test was used to check regression variables’ relevance.