Table 4.
Summary of statistical analysis of the area of the Kenyon cell clusters
| a. Analysis of variance | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | DF | Sum of squares | Mean square | F ratio | Prob > F |
| Model | 7 | 575,614,234 | 82,230,605 | 19.6491 | |
| Error | 88 | 368,276,203 | 4184956.9 | ||
| C. Total | 95 | 943,890,438 | <0.0001d | ||
| b. Effect tests | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | parme | DF | Sum of squares | F ratio | Prob > F |
| Genotype | 3 | 3 | 481,137,511 | 38.3228 | <0.0001d |
| Age (Days) | 1 | 1 | 2,815,517 | 0.6728 | 0.4143d |
| Age (Days)∗Genotype | 3 | 3 | 39,849,191 | 3.1740 | 0.0281d |
| c. Post hoc Holm’s test for multiple comparisons | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject 1 | Subject 2 | Rank | TTest p-value | Holm p-value | Significant |
| D1, N174S | D1, Y225A | 1 | 0.0001 | 0.00172 | Y |
| D35, WT | D35, Y225A | 4 | 0.0001 | 0.00192 | Y |
| D1, N174S | D1, LacZ | 5 | 0.0001 | 0.002 | Y |
| D35, N174S | D35, Y225A | 8 | 0.0001 | 0.00227 | Y |
| D1, WT | D1, Y225A | 9 | 0.0001 | 0.00238 | Y |
| D35, WT | D35, LacZ | 12 | 0.0002 | 0.00277 | Y |
| D1, WT | D1, LacZ | 14 | 0.0047 | 0.00312 | N |
| D1, N174S | D1, WT | 16 | 0.0142 | 0.00357 | N |
| D35, WT | D1, WT | 17 | 0.0293 | 0.00384 | N |
| D35, N174S | D35, LacZ | 18 | 0.0393 | 0.00416 | N |
| D35, LacZ | D35, Y225A | 19 | 0.0408 | 0.00454 | N |
| D1, N174S | D35, N174S | 20 | 0.0462 | 0.005 | N |
| D35, WT | D35, N174S | 22 | 0.0913 | 0.00625 | N |
| D1, LacZ | D1, Y225A | 23 | 0.1918 | 0.00714 | N |
| D35, LacZ | D1, LacZ | 24 | 0.3092 | 0.00833 | N |
| D35, Y225A | D1, Y225A | 27 | 0.6574 | 0.01666 | N |
a, 2-way ANOVA shows significant differences. b, Effect tests by genotype, age, and genotype-by-age. c, Post hoc Holm’s test for multiple pairwise comparisons. Only relevant pairwise interactions are shown, but the rank order is preserved from all comparisons.
Significant differences.
parm: number of parameters.