Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;9(5):761. doi: 10.18063/ijb.761

Table 2. Research on 3D-printed scaffolds for cartilage regeneration in the temporomandibular joint.

Reference 3D printing techniques Study design Animal model Cell type Cell density Scaffold materials Bioactive factors
Legemate et al. (2016)[75] EBP In vitro - Human BMSCs 2 × 106 cells/mL PLGA μS + PCL CTGF, TGF-β3
Tarafder et al. (2016)[71] EBP In vitro and in vivo Rabbit Human BMSCs 1 ×106 cells/mL PLGA μS + PCL CTGF, TGF-β3
Moura et al. (2020)[77] EBP In vitro - - - PCL + PEGDA -
Jiang et al. (2021)[79] EBP In vitro and in vivo Goat Rabbit chondrocytes and fibroblasts - (1) PCL + PVA
(2) PVA
-
Yi et al. (2021)[80] EBP In vitro and in vivo Mice Rat costal
chondrocytes and
L929 fibroblasts
2 × 106 cells/mL (1) PU-dECM
(2) PDA-PU-dECM
(3) PCL/PU-dECM
(4) PDA-PCL/PU-dECM
-
Ângelo et al. (2021)[78] EBP In vivo Sheep - - (1) PCL
(2) PGS + PCL
(3) PCL + PEGDA
-

Abbreviations: EBP, extrusion-based printing; BMSCs, bone mesenchymal stem cells; PEGDA, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate; PCL, polycaprolactone; PLGA μS, poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres; PU, polyurethane; dECM, decellularized extracellular matrix; PGS, poly(glycerol sebacate); PDA, polydopamine; CTGF, connective tissue growth factor; TGF-β3, transforming growth factor beta 3; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2.