Skip to main content
. 2023 May 25;9(5):761. doi: 10.18063/ijb.761

Table 3. Research on 3D-printed scaffolds for cartilage regeneration in the mandibular condyle.

Reference 3D printing techniques Study design Animal model Cell type Cell density Scaffold materials Bioactive factors
Schek et al. (2005)[88] FDM In vivo Mice HGFs
Pig chondrocytes
5 × 107 cells/mL HA
PLA
BMP-7
Smith et al. (2007)[84] SLS In vivo Minipig - - PCL* -
Ciocca et al. (2013)[87] SLS In vivo Sheep - - HA -
Wang et al. (2017)[89] FDM In vitro and in vivo Mice Minipig BMSCs
Minipig chondrocytes
5 × 107 cells/mL
2.5 × 107 cells/mL
PCL/HA
PGA/PLA
-
Abramowicz et al. (2021)[85] SLS In vivo Minipig - - PCL BMP-2
Helgeland et al. (2021)[90,91] EBP In vitro - Rat BMSCs 2 × 105 cells/mL;
1.2 × 106 cells/mL
Gelatin** -

Abbreviations: SLS, selective laser sintering; PCL, polycaprolactone; HA, hydroxyapatite; HGFs, human gingival fibroblasts; FDM, fused deposition modeling; CS, chitosan; PGA/PLA, polyglycolic acid/polylactic acid; BMSCs, bone mesenchymal stem cells; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor beta 1; BMP-2, bone morphogenetic protein 2; PLGA, poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid); *, the condylar head of the scaffold was packed with iliac crest bone marrow from the minipig; **, the gelatin scaffolds were crosslinked with dehydrothermal, ribose glycation, dehydrothermal-ribose, and genipin, respectively.