Table 2.
GRADE summary of findings comparing Indigenous versus non-Indigenous for primary outcomes
| Outcome | Comparator 1 vs. 2 | Study design (no. studies); Sample size |
Absolute difference (95% CI) |
Effect estimate (95% CI) |
Certainty of evidence† |
Conclusion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparator 2 risk | Absolute risk difference | ||||||
| ICU admission |
Indigenous vs non-Indigenous |
Prospective (2), Retrospective (2); Sample size range 161 to 18,742,918 people |
NA | NA |
ICU admissions among hospital admissions for severe sepsis: 4.7 per 1,000 (95% CI 3.8 to 5.7) vs. 0.9 per 1,000, p < 0.001; ICU admissions among patients hospitalized for H1N1: 35.3 per 100,000 (95% CI 16.5 to 54.4) vs. 5.7 per 100,000 (95% CI 1.8 to 9.9); age-adjusted incidence rate ratio: 5.2 (95% CI 2.3 to 12), p > 0.05; Annual incidence of ICU admissions among general population: 620.6 per 100,000 vs. 302.6 per 100,000; RR 2.1 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.35), p < 0.0001; ICU admissions with trauma-related injuries among general population: 847 per 1,000,000 vs. 251 per 1,000,000; incidence ratio 3.37 (95% CI 3.19 to 3.57), standardized to estimates for adult population of Australia |
Low1,2 | Among general populations or hospitalized patients, there may be an increased risk in ICU admission for Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous populations |
| ICU mortality |
Indigenous vs non-Indigenous |
Retrospective cohort (8); 368,541 people in ICU |
65 per 1,000 | 16 more per 1,000 (2 fewer to 40 more) | RR 1.14 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.34) | Low1,3 | Among people in ICU, there may be little-to-no difference in ICU mortality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations |
CI: confidence interval; GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; ICU: intensive care unit; NA: not applicable; no.: number; RR: rate ratio; vs.: versus
†Certainty of evidence was assessed for each outcome using GRADE methodology, starting at high for prognosis evidence, and downgrading ((if any) for one or more of the domains of study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and reporting/publication bias
1One decrement for inconsistency
2One decrement for reporting bias
3One decrement for indirectness