Table 2. Results of secondary analysis for fold-change uric acid.
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metric | Group | BoutNum | Group * BoutNum | Captivity-only | Low stress | Medium stress | High stress | |
| Uric acid | Fold-change | F3,324 = 4.32 | F5,319 = 3.82 | F15,322 = 1.59 | F5,40 = 3.48 | F5,95 = 1.44 | F5,85 = 2.66 | F5,99 = 1.36 |
| p = 2.25 × 10 −3 | p = 5.26 × 10 −3 | p = 0.07 | p = 0.01 | p = 0.22 | p = 0.03 | p = 0.24 |
Note:
Because there was no effect of pre/post-bout on fold-change uric acid in the main model (shown in Table 1), pre/post-bout was removed from the model. The results of a new model, “fold-change uric acid~group * bout num” with bird identity as a random effect, are shown in columns 3–5. Because there was a significant effect of group (and a significant interaction with group), the four treatment groups were split and four independent models were run. These four models were “fold-change uric acid~bout num” with bird identity as a random effect, and the results are down in columns 6–9. Cells that are bolded contain p-values less than 0.05.