Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;24(13):10646. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310646

Table 3.

Comparison of different plant genetic transformation methods.

Transformation Methods Tissue Type Species Delivery Type Advantages Disadvantages
Agrobacterium Cells, tissues, and whole plants Monocot and dicot DNA It has high transformation efficiency and stability It is species and genotype restricted, and random integration may result in gene destruction
Particle bombardment Any intact tissue or explant Monocot and dicot DNA, siRNA, miRNA, and RNP It is not limited by tissues or cell types The transferred DNA is not protected, the transformation efficiency is lower than with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and the equipment used is costly. High copy numbers and extensive rearrangements of foreign DNA, as well as the integration of multiple copies of the same gene in the genome, often lead to gene silencing
Electroporation Leaf blade, protoplast, meristem, and pollen grain Green algae, monocot and dicot DNA, siRNA, miRNA, and protein It is possible to transform whole cells and tissues. The transformation efficiency depends on the plant’s material It requires cell wall removal and is limited to an in vitro suspension system. It will cause tissue damage without specificity, and transformed cells have a 50% chance of survival
Liposome Protoplast, callus, and pollen Dicot DNA, RNA, and protein The wrapped nucleic acid can be protected from degradation by nucleases; specific cells as well as various cell types can be targeted. Its transformation efficiency is low
Silicon carbide whisker Callus and mature embryos Monocot DNA Its operation is simple, and its cost is low It has a low transformation efficiency, and silicon carbide whiskers are toxic
Microinjection Protoplasts, immature embryos, and pollen Monocot and dicot DNA The method, which is technically simple, may facilitate the transfer of genes to grains that are not easily regenerated from cultured cells Its transformation efficiency and frequency are low, it takes a long time to complete, it is costly, and it requires trained and certified workers to conduct experiments
Pollen tube Pollen tube Monocot and dicot DNA It does not involve tissue culture or in vitro regeneration Its transformation efficiency is low, and the transfer of exogenous genes is limited by natural flowering period