Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 27;20(13):6237. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136237

Table 2.

Advantages and disadvantages of analytical cortisol quantification methods.

Method Advantages Disadvantages
Immunoassays
  • High sensitivities (as low as in the pg·mL−1 range)

  • Use of small plasma or serum volumes

  • Faster and cheaper compared to LC-MS/MS when measuring a single hormone

  • No need to develop methods, as commercial assays for most hormones are already available

  • Require specific high-affinity antibodies, measuring a single hormone per assay

  • The amplification technologies that give immunoassays high sensitivities are often less reliable than direct quantification methods

  • Antibody cross-reactivity

  • Limited dynamic range

  • Matrix interferences

  • Lack of internal standards to calculate recovery limits

  • Reliance on external calibration

LC-MS/MS
  • Provides a robust platform with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for steroid hormone determination

  • Able to determine cortisol in samples collected through non-invasive methods

  • No cross-reactivity

  • Can be used in the analytical validation of ELISAs and RIAs

  • Allows for the simultaneous determination of several hormones

  • Use of small sample volumes

  • Fast analysis time

  • Detection of several hormones in a low volume of serum or plasma can be challenging

  • Similarity of chemical structures and fragmentation patterns demands sufficient chromatographic separation, especially for isomers

  • High instrument costs

  • Greater technical complexity, speed, and turnaround of analysis

  • Greater complexity in sample preparation is required to avoid blockages and sample matrix effects

GC-MS
  • Fast and precise

  • Excellent chromatographic resolution

  • Multi-class profiling potential

  • Intensive fragmentation patterns leading to better structure elucidation

  • More labor-intensive, requiring derivatization

  • Reproducibility issues due to incomplete compound derivatization