Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;20(13):6318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136318

Table 2.

Results of tests for measurement and structural invariance across in-person and flexible workers.

Model
Fit
Model
Comparison
Models(M) SBχ2 df RMSEA (90% CI) CFI TLI SRMR ΔM ∆SBχ2(∆df) ΔCFI
Measurement models
Model in-person 585.206 168 0.058 (0.053–0.063) 0.932 0.915 0.046
Model flexible 323.936 168 0.061 (0.051–0.071) 0.915 0.894 0.061
M1: Configural 913.868 336 0.059 (0.054–0.063) 0.928 0.910 0.050
M2: Metric 926.215 350 0.057 (0.053–0.062) 0.928 0.914 0.053 M1-M2 180.347(16)ns 0
Structural models
S4: Unconstrained structural effects across groups with metric invariance 954.667 361 0.057 (0.053–0.062) 0.926 0.914 0.058
S5: Constrained structural effects across groups with metric invariance 926.217 350 0.057 (0.053–0.062) 0.928 0.914 0.053 S4-S5 280.487(11)ns −0.002

Note. At each step in the sequence of invariance tests, all earlier constraints remained in place. df = degrees of freedom; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; SRMR = standardized root-mean-squared residual.