Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 23;24(13):10555. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310555

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Summary of the quantitative data obtained by proteomic analysis of mock and upGALC cells. (A–C) Comparison of protein counts identified for (A) A2058-mock vs. A375-mock cells, (B) A2058-mock vs. A2058-upGALC cells, and (C) A375-mock vs. A375-upGALC cells. Each Venn diagram shows the breakdown of protein counts between the two groups. Σ: total number of proteins differentially expressed in the two groups. Underlined numbers: proteins expressed at significantly higher levels in the corresponding group. Numbers in italics: proteins expressed at the same level in the two groups. Numbers in bold above the −Log(FDR) threshold value of 1.36 represent the number of proteins detected at a significant level in only one group, whereas those below the threshold value (bold and italics) represent the number of proteins detected in only one group but below the confidence level. (D,E) Volcano plot representation of proteins differentially expressed in A2058-mock vs. A375-mock cells (D), A2058-upGALC vs. A2058-mock cells (E), A375-upGALC vs. A375-mock cells (F).