Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 16;115(1):41–56. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-822

Table III.

Unresolved Disagreements Between GUPS and ISUP Recommendations.

Issues GUPS 2019 Recommendations ISUP 2019 Recommendations
IDC-P admixed with invasive PCa Only grade invasive PCa; do not assign Gleason score for IDC-P in any setting. Assign Gleason score for the entire lesion, both invasive PCa and IDC-P.
Performing basal cell stains to differentiate IDC-P and invasive PCa Necessary, but only in a minority of cases; only perform basal cell stains if the result would change the highest Grade Group for the case. Unnecessary, because IDC-P is assigned Gleason score as if it were invasive PCa.
Minor/tertiary pattern in RP specimens GP3 (≥5%), GP4, and GP5 present with GP5 < 5% GS 3 + 4 = 7 or 4 + 3 = 7 with minor/tertiary pattern 5
> 95% GP3 with < 5% GP4* GS 3 + 4 = 7 GS 3 + 3 = 6
with minor/tertiary pattern 4
> 95% GP3 with < 5% GP5* GS 3 + 5 = 8 GS 3 + 3 = 6
with minor/tertiary pattern 5
> 95% GP4 with < 5% GP5* GS 4 + 5 = 9 GS 4 + 4 = 8
with minor/tertiary pattern 5

*According to GUPS recommendation, minor/tertiary does not apply in these scenarios.

IDC-P, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate; PCa, prostatic adenocarcinoma; GS, Gleason score; GP, Gleason pattern; RP, radical prostatectomy.