Table III.
Unresolved Disagreements Between GUPS and ISUP Recommendations.
Issues | GUPS 2019 Recommendations | ISUP 2019 Recommendations | |
---|---|---|---|
IDC-P admixed with invasive PCa | Only grade invasive PCa; do not assign Gleason score for IDC-P in any setting. | Assign Gleason score for the entire lesion, both invasive PCa and IDC-P. | |
Performing basal cell stains to differentiate IDC-P and invasive PCa | Necessary, but only in a minority of cases; only perform basal cell stains if the result would change the highest Grade Group for the case. | Unnecessary, because IDC-P is assigned Gleason score as if it were invasive PCa. | |
Minor/tertiary pattern in RP specimens | GP3 (≥5%), GP4, and GP5 present with GP5 < 5% | GS 3 + 4 = 7 or 4 + 3 = 7 with minor/tertiary pattern 5 | |
> 95% GP3 with < 5% GP4* | GS 3 + 4 = 7 | GS 3 + 3 = 6 | |
with minor/tertiary pattern 4 | |||
> 95% GP3 with < 5% GP5* | GS 3 + 5 = 8 | GS 3 + 3 = 6 | |
with minor/tertiary pattern 5 | |||
> 95% GP4 with < 5% GP5* | GS 4 + 5 = 9 | GS 4 + 4 = 8 | |
with minor/tertiary pattern 5 |
*According to GUPS recommendation, minor/tertiary does not apply in these scenarios.
IDC-P, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate; PCa, prostatic adenocarcinoma; GS, Gleason score; GP, Gleason pattern; RP, radical prostatectomy.