Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 12;43(28):5191–5203. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0013-23.2023

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Effects of reward delivery and omission on DS calcium activity. A, Diagram of delayed reward DS trials and probe DS trials. B, Average DS port entry probability (n = 10 rats) across delayed reward and probe trial sessions (2 d). Behavior remains above criteria of 0.70. C, Average Z-score peri-DS calcium traces of delayed reward trials and probe trials averaged across animals (n = 10) for both days (blue, delayed reward trials; black, probe trials; ±SEM). D, Average AUC of post-DS calcium traces (0–5 s) for delayed reward (blue) and probe trials (black) across animals (n = 10; ±SEM). We observed no significant difference (sucrose, 5.38 ± 0.92; probe, 6.38 ± 0.73; p = 0.78; Bayes factor of 4.17 in favor of the null). Mean + SEM. Dots indicate individual subjects.