Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 6;12(13):4525. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134525

Table 2.

Results of unwanted negative side effects induced by immersions in VR (cybersickness) and presence according to time, condition, and participants’ country.

Canada Spain
PSAD
(n = 15)
Control
(n = 17)
PSAD
(n = 16)
Control
(n = 21)
Cybersickness
Pretest 5.67 (6.56) 2.06 (2.33) 7.81 (5.43) 3.14 (2.08)
Ctr. imm. 6.67 (5.38) 2.63 (4.53) 7.00 (6.64) 3.52 (3.16)
Exp. imm. 7.93 (6.68) 3.56 (6.05) 6.50 (4.86) 2.14 (2.22)
Presence:
Spatial ence
Pretest
Ctr. imm. 49.29 (11.82) 50.06 (8.55) 46.94 (11.23) 45.52 (11.47)
Exp. imm. 66.93 (16.93) 71.50 (10.57) 56.69 (9.43) 61.57 (11.94)
Engagement
Pretest
Ctr. imm. 40.27 (10.94) 43.88 (6.79) 39.06 (7.24) 40.57 (6.59)
Exp. imm. 44.87 (6.30) 48.75 (7.09) 45.00 (8.67) 46.67 (7.76)
Ecological validity
Pretest
Ctr. imm. 18.13 (7.06) 17.53 (3.14) 13.44 (3.27) 15.24 (3.86)
Exp. imm. 18.07 (4.80) 19.38 (3.58) 16.56 (2.73) 17.48 (3.82)
Negative effects
Pretest
Ctr. imm. 10.00 (4.05) 10.24 (6.35) 11.06 (4.78) 11.00 (4.52)
Exp. Imm 10.33 (3.48) 10.13 (4.87) 12.13 (5.28) 9.57 (3.53)