Table 2.
Neuropsychological Data Summary.
Age at Assessment (Years) |
FSIQ | VIQ | NVIQ | WM | PS | AT | VM | VisM | EF | Literacy | Math | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | 10.01 | Impaired | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | Impaired | - | Intact | - | Intact |
Case 2 | 8.03 | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | - | Impaired | - | - |
Case 3 | 5.01 | Intact | Intact | Intact | - | Impaired | Impaired | - | - | Impaired | - | - |
Case 4 | 11.09 | Impaired | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | Impaired | - | - |
Case 5 | 9.11 | Intact | Intact | Intact | - | Intact | Impaired | Intact | - | Impaired | Impaired | Intact |
Case 6 | 5.04 | Intact | Intact | Intact | - | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | - | - | - | - |
Case 7 | 7.09 | Impaired 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Intact | Intact |
Case 8 | 4.05 | - | Impaired | Impaired | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Case 9 | 11 | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | - | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired |
Case 10 | 16 | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | - | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | - | - | Impaired | Impaired |
Case 11 | 4.11 | - | Impaired | Impaired | - | - | - | - | - | Impaired | - | - |
Case 12 | 15.08 | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | - | Intact | Intact | Intact |
Case 13 | 15:00 | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired | - | - | - | Impaired | Impaired |
Case 14 | 15.02 | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Intact | Impaired | Impaired | Impaired |
Note: FSIQ = Full-Scale Intellectual Quotient, VIQ = Verbal Intellectual Quotient, NVIQ = Nonverbal Intellectual Quotient, WM = working memory, PS = processing speed, AT = attention, VM = verbal memory, VisM = visual memory, EF = executive functioning. 1 The psychological raw scores and scaled scores for Case 7 were unable to be obtained due to being stored in the Child Development Unit (The Children Hospital at Westmead). Thus, scores for this case are not converted into z-scores. However, Case 7 was considered impaired on some domains based on the DSM-5 [55] diagnoses provided in medical. In addition, reports and reports by CDU psychologists that Case 7’s literacy and numerical skills were “around the typical level for a kindergarten student”. Percentile ranks less than or at the 5th were considered impaired. Attention and academic tasks were considered impaired due to having a DSM-5 [55] ADHD diagnosis and SLD-reading, written expression, and mathematics.