Table 5.

Relationships between AMH levels and general body composition parameters.

	Model 1			Model 2			Model 3
	Univariate			Multivariate Age			Multivariate Age, FSH, E2
	R 2	β	p	R 2	β	p	R 2	β	p
Weight	0.034	−0.003	0.0002	0.062	−0.004	<0.0001	0.201	−0.002	0.0022
BSA	0.035	−0.027	0.0001	0.068	−0.319	<0.0001	0.206	−0.231	0.0006
BMI	0.022	−0.009	0.0021	0.043	−0.009	0.0021	0.189	−0.005	0.0581
WC	0.028	−0.004	0.0007	0.04	−0.003	0.0025	0.189	−0.002	0.0815
WHR	0.002	−0.264	0.188	0.018	−0.2	0.3179	0.184	−0.129	0.4816
CUN-BAE	0.028	−0.008	0.0007	0.039	−0.007	0.0044	0.187	−0.004	0.0837
eLM	0.034	−0.007	0.0002	0.067	−0.008	<0.0001	0.206	−0.006	0.0006

Goodness-of-fit (R²), linear regression coefficient (β), and p-value are given for univariate models (model 1), as well as multivariate models that include the potential confounders age (model 2) or age, FSH, and E2 (model 3) as additional predictors. Transformed AMH values were used (see methods). Significant p-values in bold. Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; CUN-BAE, Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator; eLM, estimated lean mass. Whole study cohort (n = 382).