Table 8.
Satisfaction rate of each indicator in curriculum dimensions of blended learning in universities (%).
| Indicator | Strongly disagreed | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | Mean value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course design | The content and resources of both online and offline learning are rich and interesting, and can satisfy my desire to learn. | 2.2 | 12.2 | 31.6 | 40.6 | 13.4 | 3.51 |
| The objectives of both online and offline learning are well designed | 1.5 | 12.0 | 25.8 | 44.0 | 16.7 | 3.62 | |
| Appropriate design of both online and offline learning (including the hours, frequency, interaction and connection of online and offline learning, etc.). | 1.3 | 10.4 | 33.3 | 41.0 | 14.0 | 3.55 | |
| The evaluation and assessment of the course is designed in a scientific way. | 1.0 | 15.6 | 26.9 | 40.3 | 16.2 | 3.56 | |
| Platform design | Great convenience and ease of learning with the learning platform. | 1.2 | 12.2 | 23.9 | 41.0 | 21.7 | 3.70 |
| The various functions of the learning platform (such as notes, tests and interactions, etc.) are complete, and I can make good use of them | 1.8 | 11.9 | 24.1 | 41.8 | 17.4 | 3.64 | |