Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 29;14:1193675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193675

Table 8.

Satisfaction rate of each indicator in curriculum dimensions of blended learning in universities (%).

Indicator Strongly disagreed Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree Mean value
Course design The content and resources of both online and offline learning are rich and interesting, and can satisfy my desire to learn. 2.2 12.2 31.6 40.6 13.4 3.51
The objectives of both online and offline learning are well designed 1.5 12.0 25.8 44.0 16.7 3.62
Appropriate design of both online and offline learning (including the hours, frequency, interaction and connection of online and offline learning, etc.). 1.3 10.4 33.3 41.0 14.0 3.55
The evaluation and assessment of the course is designed in a scientific way. 1.0 15.6 26.9 40.3 16.2 3.56
Platform design Great convenience and ease of learning with the learning platform. 1.2 12.2 23.9 41.0 21.7 3.70
The various functions of the learning platform (such as notes, tests and interactions, etc.) are complete, and I can make good use of them 1.8 11.9 24.1 41.8 17.4 3.64