Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 24;237(2):364–373. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000707

Table 1.

Comparison of the Global War on Terror vs Near-Peer Adversary Warfare

Variable Global War on Terror Near-peer adversary
Threat scope Limited in duration, scale of attack, and weaponry used Sustained offensive action with much broader array of weapons, in larger volume, for longer duration and further distance
Ability to quickly achieve battlespace dominance Very fast, usually within minutes to hours Unlikely able to achieve battlespace dominance
Effect of distance on safety of evacuation and rendering care The further from point of injury, the safer the patient and ability to render care No significant increase in safety until patient is entirely evacuated from the theater of operations
Use of appropriate blood transfusion for damage-control resuscitation Well established Unable to be achieved due to operational security considerations and disruption by opposition forces
Command and control of medical infrastructure Well established Unable to be achieved due to operational security considerations and disruption by opposition forces
Data collection capability for process improvement and other use Joint Trauma Registry is well established No central data collection currently exists for the war in Russia; a Joint Trauma Registry could easily be implemented