Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 13;6:720. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05089-2

Table 1.

Examples of top-ranked computationally predicted patient mutations confirmed to disrupt complex formation.

Protein Interaction partner Mutation ΔK* (Log10) scorea Reference
p53 DNA consensus sequence R248Q −4.46b Merabet et al.2
R248W −4.54b Merabet et al.
R249S −4.60b Merabet et al.
R273C −7.86c Garg et al.5
R273H −7.74c Garg et al.
R273L −7.55c Garg et al.
ASPP2/53BP2 R248W −53.49 Gorina et al.23
R249S −4.14 Gorina et al.
R273H −5.01 Gorina et al.
ERK2 DUSP6 D321N −8.76 Brenan et al.3 Taylor et al.36
p16 CDK6 G23D Xd McKenzie et al.37
M53I X Harland et al.38
D84G −5.19 Yarbrough et al.39
D84H X Ruas et al.40
D84N −5.26 Ruas et al.
D84V X Yarbrough et al.
D84Y X Ruas et al.
R87P X Yarbrough et al.
smad4 smad2 R361C −4.68 Shi et al.4
D537E −7.03 Shi et al.
D537Y X Gori et al.41

aDifference of mutant Log10 K* score in comparison to wildtype score.

bChain A results.

cChain B results.

dBinding was completely disrupted for the mutant and thus no difference to the wildtype score could be calculated.