Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 15;42(8):2037–2051. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06588-7

Table 4.

Results from mixed models evaluating the impact of treatment class on disease burden, disproportionate pain, and disease activity among combination therapy initiators

Outcomes Six-month mean (SD)/response rate Unadjusteda Adjustedb
TNFi IL-6Ri βc ORc 95% CI βc ORc 95% CI
Disease activity
  CDAI 16.7 (12.3) 18.7 (13.6) 1.12  −  -0.17, 2.40 0.48  −  -0.84, 1.81
  Achievement of LDA 478/1301 (36.7%) 124/397 (31.2%)  −  0.81 0.56, 1.18  −  0.96 0.66, 1.38
  Achievement of remission 114/1301 (8.8%) 31/397 (7.8%)  −  1.43 0.42, 4.86  −  1.23 0.34, 4.44
  Achievement of MCID in CDAI 605/1301 (46.5%) 185/397 (46.6%)  −  0.89 0.66, 1.20  −  0.97 0.71, 1.30
Disease burden
  HAQ-DI 1.0 (0.7) 1.1 (0.7) 0.03  −  -0.02, 0.09 0.01  −  -0.05, 0.07
  HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.22 456/1168 (39.0%) 142/382 (37.2%)  −  0.82 0.59, 1.15  −  0.89 0.63, 1.25
  HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.30 348/1168 (29.8%) 111/382 (29.1%)  −  0.87 0.59, 1.28  −  0.98 0.66, 1.46
  Pain VAS 45.3 (28.4) 47.8 (27.5) 0.97  −  -1.81, 3.76 0.21  −  -2.66, 3.08
  Pain VAS improvement ≥ 10 611/1308 (46.7%) 181/401 (45.1%)  −  0.78 0.54, 1.11  −  0.82 0.56, 1.18
  Patient global assessment VAS 42.0 (26.6) 45.5 (27.0) 1.73  −  -0.95, 4.41 1.30  −  -1.44, 4.04
  Patient global assessment VAS improvement ≥ 10 656/1306 (50.2%) 191/400 (47.8%)  −  0.72 0.49, 1.05  −  0.74 0.51, 1.08
  Fatigue VAS 46.4 (29.1) 49.3 (29.1) 1.18  −  -1.64, 3.99 1.13  −  -1.77, 4.03
  Fatigue VAS improvement ≥ 10 509/1165 (43.7%) 175/379 (46.2%)  −  1.02 0.74, 1.41  −  0.99 0.71, 1.38
  EQ-5D 0.7 (0.2) 0.7 (0.2) -0.00  −  -0.02, 0.01 -0.00  −  -0.02, 0.02
DP
  DP1: All initiators 165/1310 (12.6%) 71/398 (17.8%)  −  1.64 1.10, 2.45  −  1.39 0.94, 2.06
  DP1 at baseline, no DP1 at 6 months 160/258 (62.0%) 51/87 (58.6%)  −  0.83 0.42, 1.63  −  0.93 0.45, 1.89
  DP2: All initiators 332/978 (33.9%) 115/311 (37.0%)  −  1.16 0.78, 1.73  −  1.06 0.70, 1.61
  DP2 at baseline, no DP2 at 6 months 112/287 (39.0%) 38/100 (38.0%)  −  0.90 0.44, 1.88  −  1.00 0.47, 2.12

aUnadjusted models include treatment indicators and baseline value of outcome as independent variables

bAdjusted models include treatment indicators, baseline value of outcome, and covariates specified in the covariate list and those identified to be significantly different in baseline table (covariates of monotherapy initiators: biologic line of therapy, age, duration of RA, gender, work status, history of CVD, CDAI, and morning stiffness; covariates of combination therapy initiators: biologic line of therapy, history of CVD, CDAI, patient reported pain, prior use of csDMARDs, and opioids use.)

cBased on unadjusted and covariate-adjusted regression analyses (β [95% CI] for linear regressions and OR [95% CI] for logistic regressions) using TNFi group as the reference; β represents the expected difference in the mean change of outcomes from baseline to 6 months for IL-6i group compared to TNFi group

CDAI, clinical disease activity index; csDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DP, disproportionate pain; EQ-5D, EuroQol-5 Dimension score; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; IL-6i, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor; LDA, low disease activity; MCID, minimal clinically important difference; OR, odds ratio; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; SD, standard deviation; TNFi, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; VAS, visual analog scale