Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;30(2):167–177. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2023.30.2.167

Table 3.

Comparison of groups with and without osteoporosis regarding heart failure parameters, comorbidities, muscle strength, and habits

Classification Osteoporosis (T-score ≤−2.5) P-value

Yes (N=17) No (N=92)
NYHA functional class (N=109)
 I or II 3 (17.6) 33 (35.9) 0.142a)
 III or IV 14 (82.4) 59 (64.1)

LVEF (N=109)
 HFpEF 8 (47.1) 45 (48.9) 0.221a)
 HFmrEF 0 (0.0) 12 (13.0)
 HFrEF 9 (52.9) 35 (38.0)

HF etiology (N=109)
 Ischemic 7 (41.2) 56 (60.9) 0.131a)
 Non-ischemic 10 (58.8) 36 (39.1)

Glycemic status (N=109)
 Normoglycemic 2 (11.8) 20 (21.7) 0.130a)
 Prediabetes 9 (52.9) 26 (28.3)
 Diabetes 6 (35.3) 46 (50.0)

Chronic kidney disease (N=109) 5 (29.4) 33 (35.9) 0.608a)

Vitamin D deficiency (N=90) 5 (38.5) 26 (33.8) 0.742a)

Low handgrip strength (N=109) 13 (76.5) 57 (62.0) 0.251a)

Smoking history (N=109) 10 (58.8) 43 (46.7) 0.360a)

History of alcohol consumption (N=109) 9 (52.9) 45 (48.9) 0.760a)

The data is presented as N (%).

a)

Pearson’s χ2 test.

NYHA, the New York Heart Association; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HF, heart failure.