Skip to main content
. 2023 May 31;30(2):167–177. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2023.30.2.167

Table 4.

Comparison of groups with and without degradation of bone microarchitecture regarding HF parameters, comorbidities, muscle strength, and habits

Classification Bone degradation (TBS <1.230) P-value

Yes (N=13) No (N=44)
NYHA functional class (N=57)
 I or II 4 (30.8) 23 (52.3) 0.172a)
 III or IV 9 (69.2) 21 (47.7)

LVEF (N=57)
 HFpEF 5 (38.5) 24 (54.5) 0.496b)
 HFmrEF 1 (7.7) 2 (4.5)
 HFrEF 7 (53.8) 18 (40.9)

HF etiology (N=57)
 Ischemic 6 (46.2) 28 (63.6) 0.259a)
 Non-ischemic 7 (53.8) 16 (36.4)

Glycemic status (N=57)
 Normoglycemic 2 (15.4) 7 (15.9) 0.999a)
 Prediabetes 5 (38.5) 17 (38.6)
 Diabetes 6 (46.2) 20 (45.5)

Chronic kidney disease (N=57) 6 (46.2) 9 (20.5) 0.082b)

Vitamin D deficiency (N=45) 5 (55.6) 13 (36.1) 0.449b)

Low handgrip strength (N=57) 12 (92.3) 22 (50.0) 0.009b)

Smoking history (N=57) 7 (53.8) 14 (31.8) 0.148a)

History of alcohol consumption (N=57) 5 (38.5) 15 (34.1) 0.772a)

The data is presented as N (%).

a)

Pearson’s χ2 test.

b)

Fisher’s exact test.

NYHA, the New York Heart Association; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HF, heart failure; TBS, trabecular bone score.