. 2023 May 4;26(7):1345–1357. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000873

Table 3.

Quality and accuracy coding classifications of included studies, n 64

Coding classification	n	%	References
Quality, all (n 41)
Poor	20	48·8	^{(34,35,37,39,41,44,45,47,48,52,56,58,63,66,69,70,83,87,91,113)}
Moderate	10	24·4	^{(38,50,61,62,64,72,82,85,86,112,114)}
Varied	5	12·2	^{(46,59,81,89,90)}
Good	5	12·2	^{(73,84,88,92)}
Quality, websites (n 34)
Poor	16	47·1	^{(34,37,39,41,45,47,48,52,56,58,64,66,69,83,87,91,113)}
Moderate	9	26·5	^{(38,61,62,82,86,112,114)}
Varied	5	14·7	^{(46,59,81,89,90)}
Good	4	11·8	^{(73,88,92,93)}
Quality, social media (n 8)
Poor	5	62·5	^{(35,44,58,63,70)}
Moderate	2	25	^(72,85)
Varied	–		–
Good	1	12·5	⁽⁸⁰⁾
Accuracy, all (n 47)
Poor	23	48·9	^{(37,41,45,48,51,52,54,56–58,60,63–70,74,76,77,79,80)}
Moderate	12	25·5	^{(36,40,53,61,62,71,72,75,82,84)}
Varied	5	10·6	^{(55,59,78,81,116)}
Good	8	17	^{(42,46,50,73,85,92,115)}
Accuracy, websites (n 38)
Poor	18	47·4	^{(37,41,45,48,51,52,56,64–69,74,76,77,79,80)}
Moderate	10	26·3	^{(36,40,43,53,60–62,71,75,82)}
Varied	4	10·5	^{(55,59,78,81)}
Good	5	13·2	^{(46,50,73,92,115)}
Accuracy, social media (n 10)
Poor	5	50	^{(54,57,58,63,70)}
Moderate	2	20	^(72,84)
Varied	1	10	⁽⁹⁷⁾
Good	2	20	^(42,85)