Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 19;26(5):1022–1033. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002269

Table 3.

Prevalence ratios (PR) estimated from modified Poisson regression for child undernutrition according to mother’s educational attainment and household wealth status

Determinant of interest Stunting aPR 95 % CI Wasting aPR 95 % CI Underweight aPR 95 % CI Anaemia aPR 95 % CI
Mother’s education
 None 1·00 1·00 1·00 1·00
 Primary 0·87 0·80, 0·94 0·67 0·54, 0·84 0·74 0·65, 0·83 1·00 0·94, 1·06
 Secondary or higher 0·67 0·61, 0·75 0·56 0·43, 0·73 0·53 0·46, 0·62 0·91 0·84, 0·98
Trend P-value P < 0·001 P < 0·001 P < 0·001 P < 0·05
Household wealth
 Poor 1·00 1·00 1·00 1·00
 Moderate 0·90 0·83, 0·97 0·94 0·79, 1·12 0·81 0·73, 0·90 1·02 0·97, 1·08
 Rich 0·79 0·72, 0·87 0·81 0·66, 0·99 0·77 0·68, 0·88 0·90 0·84, 0·96
Trend P-value P < 0·001 P < 0·001 P < 0·001 P < 0·05

aPR: adjusted prevalence ratio.