Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 26;15(13):2887. doi: 10.3390/nu15132887

Table 1.

Differences in demographic factors and comorbid conditions between subjects where DAO-activity was and was not analyzed.

Demographic Factors DAO Analyzed
N 1051
DAO Not Analyzed
N 121
p-Value
Sex (%) Females 52.9 61.2 0.101 ^
Age (mean ± SD) 50.7 ± 15.3 48.2 ± 15.6 0.100 ^
Age group (%) 17–30 14.7 18.2 0.099 #
31–45 24.5 29.8
46–60 30.1 25.6
61–78 30.7 26.4
BMI (%) <20 4.5 4.1 0.103 #
20–24 37.0 46.3
25–29 43.2 33.9
≥30 15.3 15.7
Education level (%) Primary school 14.9 9.9 0.132 #
Secondary school 4.6 3.3
High school 34.2 40.5
University 46.1 45.5
Comorbid diseases
Asthma (%) 12.3 7.4 0.136
Sensitized to airborne allergens (%) 27.3 28.2 0.823
Sensitized to common foods (%) $ 5.4 5.7 0.823
Used medication for hay fever (%) 27.8 31.4 0.395
Heart medication (%) 9.2 5.8 0.158
Hyperlipidemia (%) 10.0 8.3 0.630
Gastric reflux (%) 44.1 49.6 0.464

^ Student’s t-test to compare mean value between DAO analyzed/not analyzed. # Mantel–Haenszel test for trend to compare frequency between DAO analyzed/not analyzed. $ Egg white, milk, fish, wheat, peanut, and soybean.