Table 2.
Definition of cut-off points for body fat percentage, fat mass index and body mass index in adults from Pelotas (RS), 2012/2013, and from Ribeirão Preto (SP), 2016/2017.
| Cardiometabolic Risk Factors | Adults from Pelotas (30 Years of Age) | Adults from Ribeirão Preto (37–39 Years of Age) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | Women | Men | Women | |||||||||
| BF% | FMI (kg/m2) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
BF% | FMI (kg/m2) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
BF% | FMI (kg/m2) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
BF% | FMI (kg/m2) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
|
| Blood pressure 1—Pelotas (1735 men and 1780 women) and Ribeirão Preto (808 men and 887 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 25.5 | 6.7 | 26.4 | 39.1 | 10.4 | 26.4 | 26.1 | 7.5 | 28.3 | 40.5 | 11.6 | 28.6 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 61.1 | 62.8 | 64.2 | 61.6 | 62.0 | 61.6 | 61.6 | 62.8 | 64.5 | 67.5 | 67.9 | 68.4 |
| Specificity (%) | 61.1 | 61.5 | 63.3 | 60.2 | 62.0 | 61.5 | 60.4 | 62.2 | 62.5 | 67.2 | 67.8 | 66.3 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.652 (0.626;0.678) |
0.668 (0.642;0.694) |
0.680 (0.654;0.705) |
0.647 (0.609;0.686) |
0.652 (0.614;0.691) |
0.653 (0.614;0.692) |
0.651 (0.614;0.689) |
0.666 (0.629;0.703) |
0.672 (0.636;0.709) |
0.729 (0.690;0.767) |
0.745 (0.707;0.783) |
0.746 (0.708;0.784) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Acceptable | Acceptable | ||||||||||
| Blood glucose 2—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (805 men and 887 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 26.3 | 7.0 | 26.8 | 38.4 | 10.0 | 25.9 | 26.6 | 7.6 | 28.6 | 39.7 | 11.2 | 28.1 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 59.3 | 59.3 | 59.3 | 56.8 | 56.8 | 56.3 | 56.5 | 56.9 | 57.7 | 60.1 | 60.1 | 58.6 |
| Specificity (%) | 58.2 | 59.0 | 58.8 | 55.7 | 56.6 | 56.2 | 55.8 | 55.1 | 56.2 | 59.8 | 59.9 | 57.9 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.609 (0.577;0.642) |
0.617 (0.585;0.650) |
0.618 (0.585;0.650) |
0.597 (0.557;0.637) |
0.596 (0.555;0.636) |
0.587 (0.546;0.629) |
0.592 (0.550;0.635) |
0.593 (0.550;0.636) |
0.581 (0.537;0.624) |
0.636 (0.594;0.678) |
0.640 (0.598;0.683) |
0.633 (0.589;0.676) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Low | Low | ||||||||||
| Triglycerides 3—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (803 men and 886 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 26.9 | 7.2 | 27.1 | 39.6 | 10.6 | 26.9 | 26.3 | 7.3 | 28.4 | 40.0 | 11.5 | 28.5 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 64.9 | 65.8 | 65.4 | 62.3 | 62.3 | 63.4 | 61.0 | 63.6 | 61.2 | 61.1 | 61.7 | 62.3 |
| Specificity (%) | 64.4 | 64.5 | 64.3 | 61.6 | 62.2 | 63.0 | 60.8 | 62.0 | 60.4 | 59.9 | 61.6 | 60.6 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.697 (0.670;0.724) |
0.708 (0.681;0.735) |
0.702 (0.674;0.729) |
0.684 (0.645;0.724) |
0.693 (0.652;0.733) |
0.684 (0.641;0.727) |
0.650 (0.612;0.688) |
0.661 (0.624;0.698) |
0.654 (0.616;0.691) |
0.655 (0.611;0.698) |
0.662 (0.619;0.706) |
0.657 (0.612;0.702) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Acceptable | Acceptable | ||||||||||
| Total cholesterol 4—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (803 men and 886 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 25.2 | 6.5 | 26.3 | 37.4 | 9.5 | 25.4 | 26.3 | 7.6 | 28.4 | 39.3 | 11.0 | 27.8 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 61.2 | 61.6 | 59.3 | 57.4 | 57.5 | 55.2 | 59.6 | 61.0 | 58.8 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 57.1 |
| Specificity (%) | 61.2 | 61.2 | 58.2 | 56.5 | 57.4 | 55.1 | 59.2 | 60.8 | 57.9 | 59.6 | 58.9 | 56.8 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.655 (0.629;0.680) |
0.652 (0.626;0.678) |
0.626 (0.599;0.652) |
0.600 (0.573;0.626) |
0.595 (0.568;0.621) |
0.583 (0.556;0.609) |
0.631 (0.593;0.669) |
0.628 (0.590;0.667) |
0.612 (0.573;0.651) |
0.635 (0.597;0.674) |
0.625 (0.586;0.663) |
0.607 (0.567;0.646) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Acceptable | Low | Low | |||||||||
| LDL-c 5—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (748 men and 874 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 27.8 | 7.5 | 27.3 | 39.7 | 10.3 | 26.1 | 27.8 | 7.7 | 28.5 | 40.6 | 11.1 | 27.5 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 63.6 | 63.6 | 61.2 | 61.2 | 58.8 | 56.5 | 60.6 | 56.1 | 53.0 | 60.0 | 55.6 | 55.6 |
| Specificity (%) | 63.3 | 63.1 | 61.1 | 61.1 | 58.2 | 56.3 | 60.0 | 55.7 | 52.9 | 59.9 | 55.0 | 51.0 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.666 (0.619;0.713) |
0.660 (0.613;0.706) |
0.625 (0.576;0.673) |
0.638 (0.580;0.697) |
0.625 (0.565;0.684) |
0.601 (0.538;0.663) |
0.614 (0.544;0.683) |
0.601 (0.535;0.668) |
0.573 (0.510;0.637) |
0.664 (0.589;0.740) |
0.618 (0.541;0.695) |
0.565 (0.483;0.647) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Acceptable | Low | Low | Acceptable | Low | |||||||
| HDL-c 6—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (802 men and 886 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 26.8 | 7.2 | 27.1 | 38.1 | 9.9 | 26.0 | 26.2 | 7.5 | 28.4 | 38.5 | 10.2 | 27.2 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 59.3 | 60.8 | 60.3 | 54.8 | 56.3 | 57.7 | 55.1 | 56.8 | 56.5 | 57.7 | 59.3 | 59.9 |
| Specificity (%) | 58.8 | 60.1 | 59.6 | 54.5 | 56.0 | 57.5 | 54.4 | 55.1 | 56.0 | 57.1 | 59.2 | 59.2 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.618 (0.577;0.659) |
0.630 (0.588;0.672) |
0.633 (0.589;0.676) |
0.558 (0.522;0.594) |
0.574 (0.538;0.611) |
0.585 (0.548;0.621) |
0.580 (0.540;0.619) |
0.588 (0.549;0.628) |
0.587 (0.547;0.626) |
0.604 (0.567;0.641) |
0.620 (0.582;0.657) |
0.626 (0.589;0.663) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Low | Low | ||||||||||
| C-reactive protein 7—Pelotas (1717 men and 1771 women) and Ribeirão Preto (801 men and 885 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 25.3 | 6.3 | 26.7 | 39.6 | 10.8 | 27.2 | 27.2 | 7.3 | 28.3 | 42.2 | 12.2 | 29.6 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 51.6 | 48.4 | 54.8 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 63.2 | 54.5 | 54.5 | 54.5 | 68.6 | 65.7 | 65.7 |
| Specificity (%) | 50.4 | 47.7 | 54.0 | 60.1 | 63.0 | 63.2 | 54.4 | 48.0 | 49.1 | 66.1 | 65.1 | 64.7 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.526 (0.414;0.637) |
0.523 (0.409;0.637) |
0.523 (0.403;0.644) |
0.675 (0.603;0.746) |
0.679 (0.607;0.752) |
0.673 (0.599;0.748) |
0.577 (0.363;0.791) |
0.565 (0.344;0.787) |
0.539 (0.300;0.779) |
0.740 (0.652;0.828) |
0.740 (0.657;0.824) |
0.738 (0.662;0.815) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Low | Acceptable | Low | Acceptable | ||||||||
| Glycated hemoglobin 8—Pelotas (1718 men and 1772 women) and Ribeirão Preto (805 men and 883 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 25.7 | 6.7 | 26.4 | 37.7 | 9.8 | 25.9 | 27.5 | 7.8 | 29.0 | 40.5 | 11.8 | 29.2 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 53.4 | 52.0 | 51.3 | 51.9 | 54.4 | 55.7 | 58.9 | 58.1 | 58.1 | 61.1 | 63.9 | 65.7 |
| Specificity (%) | 52.6 | 52.0 | 50.5 | 51.7 | 54.3 | 55.6 | 58.7 | 58.0 | 58.1 | 60.9 | 63.7 | 65.3 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.539 (0.492;0.587) |
0.537 (0.489;0.584) |
0.527 (0.478;0.576) |
0.545 (0.498;0.592) |
0.556 (0.509;0.603) |
0.565 (0.518;0.612) |
0.614 (0.559;0.667) |
0.622 (0.568;0.676) |
0.624 (0.570;0.677) |
0.638 (0.579;0.696) |
0.677 (0.621;0.733) |
0.709 (0.656;0.761) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | No discrimination | Low | Low | Acceptable | ||||||||
| Three or more cardiometabolic risk factors—Pelotas (1735 men and 1782 women) and Ribeirão Preto (808 men and 888 women) | ||||||||||||
| Cut-off | 26.8 | 7.2 | 27.0 | 39.6 | 10.5 | 26.9 | 26.3 | 7.5 | 28.4 | 40.0 | 11.4 | 28.5 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 65.7 | 66.1 | 65.9 | 63.4 | 63.0 | 64.3 | 61.9 | 64.2 | 63.2 | 65.0 | 65.4 | 64.6 |
| Specificity (%) | 65.0 | 66.0 | 64.8 | 62.3 | 62.4 | 63.9 | 61.8 | 64.0 | 62.3 | 64.2 | 65.4 | 64.5 |
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.713 (0.687;0.739) |
0.721 (0.695;0.747) |
0.707 (0.679;0.734) |
0.675 (0.636;0.714) |
0.681 (0.641;0.720) |
0.673 (0.632;0.714) |
0.680 (0.643;0.717) |
0.691 (0.655;0.727) |
0.683 (0.647;0.720) |
0.708 (0.670;0.745) |
0.720 (0.683;0.757) |
0.717 (0.679;0.755) |
| Discriminant Power (AUC) | Acceptable | Acceptable | ||||||||||
BF%: body fat percentage; FMI: fat mass index; BMI: body mass index; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval. 1 Blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or ≥ 85 mmHg. 2 Blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL. 3 Triglicerides ≥ 175 mg/dL. 4 Total cholesterol ≥ 190 mg/dL. LDL-c: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.; 5 LDL-c ≥ 160 mg/dL. 6 HDL-c < 40 mg/dL (men) and < 50 mg/dL (women). 7 C-reactive protein > 2 mg/dL. 8 Glycated hemoglobin ≥ 5.7%.