Table 3.
Eligibility criteria using (MMAT) Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
| Authors | Journal | Publication Year | Category of Study Designs | S1 | S2 | 1,1 | 1,2 | 1,3 | 1,4 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 3,2 | 3,3 | 3,4 | 3,5 | 4,1 | 4,2 | 4,3 | 4,4 | 4,5 | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoellner et al. [51] | Matern. Child Health J. | 2022 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 77% |
| Anselma et al. [52] | Health Educ. Behav. | Early Access | Quantitative non-randomized | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 86% |
| Patte et al. [53] | Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev. Can.-Res. Policy Pract. | 2021 | Quantitative non-randomized | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 97% |
| Beck et al. [7] | Public Health Nutr. | 2020 | Quantitative non-randomized | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 87% |
| Gallagher et al. [27] | Br. Dent. J. | 2019 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 53% * |
| Hess et al. [54] | Public Health Nutr. | 2019 | Qualitative | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 54% * |
| Cordrey et al. [55] | Pediatrics | 2018 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 54% * |
| Hahn et al. [55] | BMC Public Health | 2018 | Quantitative non-randomized | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 90% | |
| Pakkila et al. [6] | Acta Odontol. Scand. | 2017 | Quantitative non-randomized | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 87% | |
| Larson et al. [28] | J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. | 2014 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 76% |
| Tolvanen et al. [57] | Acta Odontol. Scand. | 2014 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 77% |
| Austin et al. [58] | Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. | 2013 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 77% |
| Cunningham et al. [59] | Matern. Child Health J. | 2012 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 87% |
| Tolvanen et al. [60] | Community Dentist. Oral Epidemiol. | 2010 | Quantitative randomized clinical trials | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 76% |
| Kawashita et al. [61] | J. Public Health Dent. | 2009 | Quantitative descriptive | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 77% |
* Study is considered as moderate quality 50–74%, and was excluded from the category analysis, and discussion.