Table 5.
Comparison of the proposed method and other state-of-the-art methods on the TUAB dataset.
Study | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
---|---|---|---|
Yildirim et al. [43] | 79.34 | ||
Roy et al. [44] | 82.27 | ||
Schirrmeister et al. [13] | 85.4 | 75.1 | 94.1 |
Khan et al. [46] | 85 | ||
Gemein et al. [12] | 86.1 | 79.7 | 91.6 |
Roy et al. [11] | 86.57 | ||
Kiessner et al. [47] | 86.59 | 78.17 | 93.67 |
Amin et al. [45] | 87.32 | 78.57 | 94.67 |
Proposed model | 88.76 | 84.92 | 92 |