Table 2.
Top three policy options by domain and actor connected to issue statement
| Actor* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain | Issue statement | Funders | Journals | Data resources | Other** |
| Financial sustainability | Stable funding (FS1) | ✔ | |||
| Broaden existing resources (FS7) | ✔ | ||||
| Low-cost storage (FS4) | ✔ | ||||
| Equity | Support small studies if with underrepresented (E6) | ✔ | |||
| Equip lower-resourced groups to use data (E8) | X | ✔ | |||
| Community needs assessments (E1) | ✔ | X | |||
| Data quality | Data-sharing infrastructure (Q2) | ✔ | |||
| Quality checks (Q8) | ✔ | ||||
| Comply with standards (Q1) | ✔ | ||||
| Incentives | Publication conditional on data sharing (I9) | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Peer-review data-sharing plans (I4) | ✔ | ||||
| Monitor for and punish noncompliance (I5) | ✔ | ||||
| Privacy and security | Federated models (PS10) | ✔ | ✔ | ||
| Novel technologies (PS9) | ✔ | ✔ | |||
| Transparency about risks and harms (PS8) | ✔ | ✔ | |||
*Cells marked with an X indicate that the actor was identified as connected to a policy option in a panelist comment rather than in the framing of the policy option. Checkmarks indicate that the actor was included in the framing of the policy option.
**Other includes: clinical labs (PS10), individual researchers (E1, PS10, and PS8), institutions (PS10, PS9, and PS8), and end users of data (PS10, PS9).