Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 20;13(7):4103–4116. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1119

Table 3. Multivariate analysis of the relationship between NCP and the relevant factors.

Factor Model 1 Model 2
β* (95% CI) P value β* (95% CI) P value
HCM −0.213 (−0.325 to −0.102) <0.001 −0.235 (−0.341 to −0.129) <0.001
LV mass/BSA (g/m2) −0.016 (−0.018 to −0.015) <0.001 −0.014 (−0.016 to −0.013) <0.001
EDV (mL) 0.014 (0.013 to 0.015) <0.001 0.012 (0.011 to 0.013) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) −0.014 (−0.024 to −0.004) 0.006 −0.017 (−0.026 to −0.007) <0.001
EF (%) 0.009 (0.005 to 0.014) <0.001 0.010 (0.005 to 0.014) <0.001
Hypertension (%) 0.168 (0.068 to 0.268) 0.001 0.149 (0.059 to 0.240) 0.001
Arrhythmia (%) −0.085 (−0.186 to 0.016) 0.10 −0.090 (−0.186 to 0.006) 0.06
Male (%) 0.057 (−0.024 to 0.138) 0.16
Age (years) −0.001 (−0.003 to 0.002) 0.86
Diabetes (%) −0.037 (−0.154 to 0.081) 0.53
Hyperlipidemia (%) −0.026 (−0.135 to 0.082) 0.48
CAD (%) −0.048 (−0.178 to 0.083) 0.47

β* indicates the changed value of NCP with a 1 unit increase of the determinant. NCP, normalized cardiac power; CI, confidence interval; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LV, left ventricle; BSA, body surface area; EDV, end-diastole volume; BMI, body mass index; EF, ejection fraction; CAD, coronary artery disease.