Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;13(7):4205–4221. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1182

Table 3. Comparison of detection sensitivity of different lung nodule detection algorithms.

Algorithm 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 CPM
Xie [2019] (25) 73.40 74.40 76.30 79.60 82.40 83.20 83.40 79.00
Zuo [2019] (26) 67.20 69.40 71.40 73.90 76.60 78.70 82.20 74.20
You [2019] (27) 62.40 64.30 67.70 72.80 80.00 85.80 90.00 74.70
Sun [2021] (28) 46.7 60.2 73.0 81.2 87.7 92.0 93.1 76.20
Hong [2021] (29) 60.05 70.18 80.01 84.39 89.99* 92.16* 94.42* 81.60
Yang [2021] (30) 56.40 67.40 75.70 78.20 83.50 87.60 91.20 77.20
Improved model 69.83* 80.00* 82.36* 84.42* 84.79 85.23 86.16 81.83*

*, the highest sensitivity of the detection at that FP rate. CPM, challenge performance metric; FP, false positive.