Table 1.
GM to HR-HLA CeD | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAXONOMIC LEVEL | 2SMR RESULTS | |||||||
Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | IVs | Beta | SE | p-value |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcaceae UCG010 | 3 | 1,690 | 0,828 | 0,041 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcaceae UCG011 | 2 | -1,190 | 0,509 | 0,019 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Lachnospiraceae UCG008 | 3 | 1,462 | 0,586 | 0,012 |
Firmicutes | Negativicutes | Veillonellales | Veillonellaceae | - | 7 | 1,112 | 0,454 | 0,014 |
– | – | – | – | FamilyXIII UCG001 | 4 | 1,216 | 0,580 | 0,036 |
HR-HLA CeD to GM | ||||||||
TAXONOMIC LEVEL | 2SMR RESULTS | |||||||
Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus | IVs | Beta | SE | p-value |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Ruminococcaceae | Anaerotruncus | 3 | -0,053 | 0,018 | 0,003 |
Firmicutes | Clostridia | Clostridiales | Lachnospiraceae | Tyzzerella3 | 3 | -0,084 | 0,032 | 0,008 |
Bacteroidetes | Bacteroidia | Bacteroidales | Rikenellaceae | RikenellaceaeRC9 gutgroup | 3 | 0,085 | 0,040 | 0,036 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | – | – | - | 3 | 0,047 | 0,018 | 0,011 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pasteurellales | – | - | 3 | 0,049 | 0,024 | 0,041 |
Proteobacteria | Gammaproteobacteria | Pasteurellales | Pasteurellaceae | - | 3 | 0,049 | 0,024 | 0,041 |
– | – | – | – | Unknowngenus | 3 | -0,057 | 0,023 | 0,014 |
Significant threshold was set at p-value <0.05 for the Inverse Variance Weighted method (IVW). IVs, Instrumental Variables; SE, standard error.
In black are depicted the direct results from our bidirectional 2SMR analysis, while in grey are indicated the upper taxonomic level of each hit.