Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e070927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927

Table 2.

System characteristics

System characteristic/feature *multiple response options total ≠ 100% Number n=10 (skipped response) Response %
System launched (0)
In development 1 10%
<1 year 1 10%
1–5 years 5 50%
>5 years 3 30%
Primary objective of system* (0)
Improving symptom assoc with CKD 7 70%
Improving symptom assoc with treatment 5 50%
Psychosocial care 0 0%
Facilitate communication 4 40%
Research 3 30%
Benchmarking 0 0%
Commissioning 0 0%
Support transition of care 0 0%
Secondary objective of system* (0)
Improving symptom assoc CKD 2 20%
Improving symptom assoc treatment 4 40%
Psychosocial care 8 80%
Facilitate communication 6 60%
Research 4 40%
Benchmarking 2 20%
Commissioning 1 10%
Support transition of care 2 20%
Academic (0)
Charitable 5 50%
Government 4 40%
How developed? 1 10%
In-house informatics team (0)
Collaboration across sectors 1 10.0%
Commercial product 4 40.0%
Funding source* 3 30.0%
Commercial 3 30.0%
Primary location of use* (0)
Primary care (community/general practice clinic) 10.0% 1
Secondary care (hospital clinic) 80.0% 8
Dialysis centre 60.0% 6
Home 20.0% 2
System platform* (0)
Non-responsive website 2 20.0%
Responsive/mobile website 8 80.0%
Mobile application 2 20.0%
System access* (0)
Computer 7 70.0%
Tablet 10 100.0%
Interactive voice response system 0 0.0%
Clinic-based kiosk 2 20.0%
Smartphone 7 70.0%
PRO selection* (2)
Automatic (by system) that is, provider 8 100%
By patient 0 0.0%
System security features* (1)
Secure log in 9 100.0
Encryption 7 77.8%
Two factor log in 1 11.1%
Unsure 1 11.1%
Page features* (1)
Progress bar 6 66.7%
Visual graphics that is, graph, diagram, chart 4 44.4%
Automatic save function, option to save and return later 1 11.1%
Training available (0)
Yes 9 90%
No 1 10%
Who receives training?* (1)
Clinical staff 9 100.0%
Administrative staff 4 44.4%
Patients 7 77.8%
Carers 0 0.0%
Form of ePRO system training* (1)
Face to face 7 77.8%
Online 7 77.8%
Integrated into ePRO system 2 22.2%
Facility for patient education* (2)
Administered in system 4 50.0%
Education linked to ePRO scores 1 12.5%
Automatic documentation of action 0 0.0%
No patient education offered 4 50.0%
In development 1 12.5%
Has the system been evaluated? (0)
Yes 7 70%
No 3 30%

CKD, chronic kidney disease; ePRO, electronic patient-reported outcome.