Table 4.
The pooled effect of social communication function after excluding a single study.
| Scoring types and included studies | SMD | 95% CI | p (the pooled effect) | I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnes S. Chan 2013 | 0.50 | 0.20,0.80 | p < 0.001 | 55 |
| Ahmadreza Movahedi 2013 | 0.40 | 0.10,0.70 | p < 0.05 | 58 |
| Amir Hossein Haghighi 2022 | 0.47 | 0.16,0.78 | p < 0.05 | 60 |
| Fatimah Bahrami 2015 | 0.43 | 0.12,0.75 | p < 0.05 | 61 |
| Janice N. Phung 2019 | 0.53 | 0.26,0.80 | p < 0.001 | 45 |
| Jin-Gui Wang 2020 | 0.44 | 0.12,0.76 | p < 0.05 | 61 |
| Kelong Cai 2020 | 0.42 | 0.11,0.73 | p < 0.05 | 60 |
| Ke-Long Cai 2020 | 0.41 | 0.10,0.71 | p < 0.05 | 58 |
| Mahboubeh G. N 2018 | 0.41 | 0.10,0.72 | p < 0.05 | 59 |
| Mirella Zanobini 2019 | 0.47 | 0.15,0.78 | p < 0.05 | 60 |
| Sabine C Koch 2015 | 0.52 | 0.24,0.80 | p < 0.001 | 49 |
| Sixin Yang 2021 | 0.41 | 0.10,0.72 | p < 0.05 | 59 |
| Supritha Aithal 2021 | 0.45 | 0.14,0.77 | p < 0.05 | 61 |
| Wenxin Xu 2019 | 0.41 | 0.09,0.73 | p < 0.05 | 57 |