Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;24:145. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02095-5

Table 2.

Self-reported approach to customers with complex medical comorbidities

All respondents (n=434) Non-clinicians only (n=355)
Yes, n (%) State medicalization scorea,b
(aOR [95% CI])
Statewide adult usea,b
(aOR [95% CI])
State medicalization scorea,c
(aOR [95% CI])
Statewide adult usea,c
(aOR [95% CI])
What do you do when you encounter a customer who is using cannabis to treat a medical condition (such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, or multiple sclerosis)?
 Encourage customer to inform physician or other healthcare professional about cannabis use 293 (67.5%) 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 1.2 (0.7-2.0) 1.1 (0.9-1.4) 1.3 (0.8-2.2)
 Encourage customer to seek traditional medical care in addition to OR instead of cannabis 247 (56.9%) 1.0 (0.8-1.1) 1.3 (0.8-2.1) 1.0 (0.8-1.2) 1.3 (0.8-2.1)
 Encourage customer to seek traditional medical care in addition to cannabis 216 (49.8%) 1.0 (0.9-1.1) 1.3 (0.8-2.0) 1.0 (0.8-1.1) 1.4 (0.8-2.3)
 Encourage customer to do additional research online 212 (48.8%) 0.9 (0.8-1.0) 1.6 (1.0-2.6) 0.9 (0.8-1.1) 1.9 (1.1-3.1)
 Encourage customer to seek traditional medical care instead of cannabis 47 (10.8%) 1.1 (0.8-1.4) 1.3 (0.5-3.5) 1.1 (0.8-1.6) 0.5 (0.2-1.9)
 I don't do anything differently 42 (9.7%) 1.1 (0.8-1.3) 0.5 (0.2-1.1) 1.1 (0.8-1.3) 0.5 (0.2-1.2)
 Encourage customer to continue only cannabis 40 (9.2%) 1.2 (0.9-1.6) 2.3 (0.9-6.0) 1.3 (1.0-1.8) 1.7 (0.6-5.1)
 I have never encountered a customer who is using cannabis to treat a medical condition 10 (2.3%) 1.2 (0.7-1.9) 0.3 (0-2.2) 1.2 (0.7-1.9) 0.3 (0-2.2)

Abbreviations: aOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, CI confidence interval

aRegression full model includes: state medicalization score per 10-point increment; statewide adult use (yes/no [ref]); age per 10-point increment; role (budtender [ref], manager, physician/NP/PA, pharmacist, other); years working in cannabis industry (categorical- <6 months [ref], 6 months-1 year, 1-2 years, >2 years, no response); sales commission (yes/no); Education (categorical)

b n=428, c n=351

*This table presents a series of mixed effects multivariable regression models in which each row represents the dependent variable with each column representing and independent variable in separate regression models. A random effect was included for state to account for clustering

Bolded values have p-value<0.05

‘Other, please describe’ is not shown