Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;23:150. doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01405-3

Table 2.

Prevalence and association of 25(OH)D deficiency (< 30 nmol/L) in T1D and NG children and adolescents (n = 444)

Prevalence of 25(OH)D deficiency (< 30 nmol/L) Multiple Logistic Regression
Cases (T1D) Controls (NG) Age and Sex Adjusted P-valuea Mutually Adjusted OR [aOR] P-value*
Diabetes Status
 Normoglycaemia 120 (40.5%) Ref
 Type 1 33 (22.3%) 0.39 (0.24, 0.62) 0.000 0.39 (0.24, 0.65) 0.000
Vitamin D Medication
 No 4 (15.4%) 17 (20.5%) Ref
 Yes 29 (23.7%) 103 (48.4%) 2.08 (1.19, 3.63) 0.009 2.14 (1.20, 3.81) 0.010
BMI Group
 Normal Weight 18 (18.7%) 60 (38.5%) Ref
 Underweight 2 (22.2%) 7 (22.6%) 0.77 (0.33, 1.79) 0.549 0.73 (0.31, 1.74) 0.482
 Overweight 8 (29.6%) 13 (37.1%) 0.92 (0.49, 1.72) 0.801 0.90 (0.47, 1.72) 0.750
 Obesity 5 (31.2%) 40 (54.0%) 2.69 (1.56, 4.64) 0.000 2.12 (1.21, 3.71) 0.008
Age (years)
 Children (4—< 10) 3 (8.5%) 10 (14.1%) Ref
 Adolescent (10–19) 30 (26.5%) 110 (48.9%) - 4.00 (2.06, 7.77) 0.000
Sex
 Male 7 (10.6%) 29 (23.6%) Ref
 Female 26 (31.7%) 91 (52.6%) - 3.19 (1.97, 5.16) 0.000

NG Normoglycaemic controls, T1D Type 1 Diabetes

aAge and sex adjusted, unconditional logistic regression

* Mutually adjusted logistic regression, model fit was assessed by a goodness of fit Hosmer–Lemeshow test (p = 0.815)