Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;23:483. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03209-2

Table 3.

Methodological quality assessment

Studies Calculation of the required number subjects Bruxism diagnosis [1] Assessment method of outcome Several evaluators Blinding assessment of outcome Patients selection bias
Padmaja Satheeswarakumar et al., 2018 [21] No Probable Moderate risk of bias Yes Not specified No
Türp et al., 2021 [22] No Probable Moderate risk of bias Yes Not specified Yes
Isman, 2021 [23] Yes Possible Moderate risk of bias Yes Yes No
Eninanc et al., 2021 [24] Yes Probable Moderate risk of bias No No No
Eninanc et al., 2021 [26] Yes Probable Moderate risk of bias No No No
Gulec et al., 2021 [25] Yes Probable Moderate risk of bias Yes Yes No
Yilmaz et al., 2022 [27] Yes Probable Moderate risk of bias Yes Yes No
Serafim et al., 2022 [28] Yes Probable Low risk of bias No Yes No
Casazza et al., 2023 [29] Yes Probable Moderate risk of bias Yes Yes No