Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 4;6(1):34. doi: 10.5334/joc.286

Table 2.

Temporal predictability in a wider context – Musical dimensions and the reported experience.


A. VALENCE

GLASS (n = 36) LIGETI, RIC. 1 (n = 37) LIGETI, RIC. 2 (n = 37) MUSSORGSKY, PART 1 (n = 34)




MEAN B(SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B(SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B(SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B(SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP)

Loudness/ timbre –0.026 (0.012) p = 0.038 –0.038 (0.018) p = 0.02 –0.032 (0.009) p < 0.001 –0.055 (0.015) p < 0.001

Pitch –0.008 (0.006) p = 0.28 –0.015 (0.008) p = 0.05 –0.002 (0.012) p = 0.8 0.022 (0.01) p = 0.04

Tempo –0.017 (0.012) p = 0.17 –0.046 (0.018) p = 0.006 –0.021 (0.012) p = 0.09 –0.051 (0.015) p < 0.001

Attack Slope –0.003 (0.006) p = 0.67 0.031 (0.011) p = 0.02 0.02 (0.01) p = 0.05 0.001 (0.006) p = 0.88

Spectral Spread 0.072 (0.012) p < 0.001 –0.025 (0.01) p = 0.006 –0.008 (0.003) p = 0.06 0.001 (0.005) p = 0.87

Spectral Irregularity 0.022 (0.004) p < 0.001 0.027 (0.007) p = 0.02 –0.009 (0.004) p = 0.054 –0.009 (0.005) p = 0.05

Key 0.012 (0.004) p = 0.02 0.046 (0.019) p = 0.006 –0.003 (0.003) p = 0.38 –0.012 (0.002) p < 0.002

Musical Surprises 0.011 (0.003) p = 0.002 0.003 (0.004) p = 0.38 0.007 (0.003) p = 0.07 0.002 (0.005) p = 0.66

Inter-subject-tapping-coherence 0.037 (0.007) p < 0.0001 0.034 (0.012) p = 0.003 0.021 (0.009) p = 0.01 0.019 (0.005) p < 0.001

B. AROUSAL

GLASS (n = 36) LIGETI, RIC. 1 (n = 37) LIGETI, RIC. 2 (n = 37) MUSSORGSKY, PART 1 (n = 34)




MEAN B (SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B (SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B (SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP) MEAN B (SE) p-VALUE (BOOTSTRAP)

Loudness/ timbre 0.119 (0.016) p < 0.001 0.111 (0.015) p < 0.001 0.076 (0.01) p < 0.001 0.122 (0.015) p < 0.001

Pitch 0.04 (0.009) p < 0.001 0.03 (0.01) p < 0.001 0.046 (0.012) p < 0.001 0.017 (0.01) p = 0.094

Tempo 0.082 (0.015) p < 0.001 0.105 (0.011) p < 0.001 0.113 (0.017) p < 0.001 0.098 (0.014) p < 0.001

Attack Slope 0.006 (0.006) p = 0.48 0.002 (0.007) p = 0.82 –0.014 (0.011) p = 0.26 –0.007 (0.003) p = 0.17

Spectral Spread –0.022 (0.01) p = 0.023 –0.019 (0.007) p = 0.02 0.013 (0.003) p = 0.013 –0.027 (0.006) p < 0.001

Spectral Irregularity –0.005 (0.004) p = 0.25 0 (0.008) p = 0.99 –0.009 (0.006) p = 0.15 –0.011 (0.005) p = 0.02

Key 0.011 (0.004) p = 0.07 0.034 (0.013) p = 0.01 0.016 (0.004) p = 0.0001 0.011 (0.003) p = 0.002

Musical Surprises 0.005 (0.003) p = 0.25 0.008 (0.002) p = 0.026 0.003 (0.003) p = 0.51 0.003 (0.004) p = 0.49

Inter-subject-tapping-coherence 0.001 (0.008) p = 0.97 –0.009 (0.009) p = 0.41 0.016 (0.01) p = 0.11 0 (0.005) p = 0.96

Note A: Averages of regression coefficients for the nine musical dimensions ±1 SEM for explaining continuous valence ratings are depicted per index of reported experience along with the level of statistical significance. Effects reaching statistical significance of p < .05 after False Discovery Rate correction for multiple comparisons are highlighted in light grey. Musical factors that show consistent effects across sections are highlighted in dark grey.

Note B: Averages of regression coefficients for the nine musical dimensions ±1 SEM for explaining continuous arousal ratings are depicted per index of reported experience along with the level of statistical significance. Effects reaching statistical significance of p < .05 after False Discovery Rate correction for multiple comparisons are highlighted in light grey. Musical factors that show consistent effects across sections are highlighted in dark grey.