Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet HIV. 2022 Jul;9(7):e464–e473. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00126-6

Table 2.

Percentage of participants reporting primary outcomes, by study group and population

Outcome Standard of care Oral-fluid + Blood-based HIVST1 Oral-fluid HIVST1 Blood-based HIVST1 Overall
All participants 166 329 163 166 495

Returned to clinic2 140 (84·3%) 277 (84·2%) 139 (85·3%) 138 (83·1%) 417 (84·2%)
 Co-Primary: Tested for HIV* 140 (84·3%) 274 (83·3%) 139 (85·3%) 135 (81·3%) 414 (83·6%)
 Co-Primary: Refilled PrEP* 134 (80·7%) 257 (78·1%) 130 (79·8%) 127 (76·5%) 391 (79·0%)
 Co-Primary: Adherent (any TFV-DP detected)* 95 (57·2%) 200 (60·8%) 94 (57·7%) 106 (63·9%) 295 (59·6%)
HIV serodifferent couples 3 99 196 97 99 295

Returned to clinic2 85 (85·9%) 165 (84·2%) 84 (86·6%) 81 (81·8%) 250 (84·8%)
 Tested for HIV 85 (85·9%) 163 (83·2%) 84 (86·6%) 79 (79·8%) 248 (84·1%)
 Refilled PrEP 79 (79·8%) 154 (78·6%) 78 (80·4%) 76 (76·8%) 233 (79·0%)
 Adherent (any TFV-DP detected) 74 (74·8%) 132 (67·4%) 65 (67·0%) 67 (67·7%) 206 (69·8%)
All women 3 111 219 109 110 330

Returned to clinic2 91 (82·0%) 186 (84·9%) 93 (85·3%) 93 (84·6%) 277 (83·9%)
 Tested for HIV 91 (82·0%) 184 (84·0%) 93 (85·3%) 91 (82·7%) 275 (83·3%)
 Refilled PrEP 88 (79·3%) 173 (79·0%) 87 (79·8%) 86 (78·2%) 261 (79·1%)
 Adherent (any TFV-DP detected) 50 (45·1%) 125 (57·1%) 57 (52·3%) 68 (61·8%) 175 (53·0%)
Women singly enrolled 3 67 133 66 67 200

Returned to clinic2 55 (82·1%) 112 (84·2%) 55 (83·3%) 57 (85·1%) 167 (83·5%)
 Tested for HIV 55 (82·1%) 111 (83·5%) 55 (83·3%) 56 (83·6%) 166 (83·0%)
 Refilled PrEP 55 (82·1%) 103 (77·4%) 52 (78·8%) 51 (76·1%) 158 (79·0%)
 Adherent (any TFV-DP detected) 21 (31·3%) 68 (51·1%) 29 (43·9%) 39 (58·2%) 89 (44·5%)

Abbreviations:HIV self-testing (HIVST); pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); tenofovir-diphosphate (TFP-DP).

*

Primary study outcomes were HIV testing (past six months), PrEP refilling (at six-month visit), and PrEP adherence (any TFV-DP detected) at six months among all participants, with the primary comparison being the pooled six-month PrEP dispensing + interim HIVST intervention arms vs. the standard-of-care PrEP dispensing arm.

1

Participants randomized to these intervention arms received six-month PrEP dispensing + interim HIVST (either oral-fluid or blood-based) with biannual clinic visits.

2

We included all follow-up visits assigned as six-month visits by study staff; the window for these visits closed 2 weeks prior to the next scheduled visit date, which as at nine months for participants randomized to the SOC group and 12 months for participants randomized to one of the intervention arms.

3

The sub-group HIV serodifferent couples included all men and women enrolled in HIV serodifferent couples (N=295). The sub-group all women included both women enrolled in HIV serodifferent couples and women singly enrolled (N=330). The sub-group women singly enrolled just included these women and not those enrolled in HIV serodifferent couples (N=200).