Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;11:e15496. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15496

Table 1. Proximate composition of freshwater macrophyte species and compares proximate composition (given as mean) of freshwater macrophyte species and other edible plant species.

No. Species Moisture (%) Ash (%) Crude lipid (%) Crude fibre (%) Crude protein (%) Carbohydrate (%) Energy (cal g −1 ) Trend
Freshwater macrophytes
1 Eichhornia crassipes 10.34 ± 0.76a (7.90–12.70) 13.23 ± 0.30b (11.93–14.14) 1.43 ± 0.26c (0.56–2.39) 21.34 ± 0.33a (20.16–22.58) 9.58 ± 0.73c (7.53–11.71) 54.42 ± 0.42a (52.89–56.05) 3395.15 ± 26.61b (3253.20–3481.90) C>F>A>M>P>L
2 Limnocharis flava 7.99 ± 0.46b (6.60–9.70) 18.31 ± 0.92a (15.70–20.83) 5.75 ± 0.84a (2.62–8.07) 15.33 ± 1.18b (11.48–19.50) 16.58 ± 2.01b (11.21–22.09) 44.03 ± 0.91b (40.62–48.29) 3486.98 ± 151.34b (2996.10–3905.70) C>A>P>F>M>L
3 Neptunia oleracea 10.82 ± 0.51a (9.33–11.50) 7.42 ± 0.04c (7.31–7.51) 3.48 ± 0.12b (3.13–3.64) 8.73 ± 0.30c (8.04–9.39) 29.61 ± 0.11a (29.32–29.87) 50.76 ± 0.29a (49.95–51.20) 4269.65 ± 31.08a (4203.80–4353.10) C>P>M>F>A>L

Notes.

The varying superscript alphabets in the same column demonstrate the contrasts at p < 0.05 (ANOVA, Duncan’s Multiple Range Test test). Values are given as mean ± SE and range in parenthesis.