Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;11:e15496. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15496

Table 4. Comparison of mineral contents of freshwater macrophyte species and other edible plant species.

No Species Ca Mg Cu Mn Zn Reference (s)
(mg kg −1 )
1 Eichhornia crassipes 11,863.5 1,649 27.0 444.0 158.5 Present study
2 Limnocharis flava 8,066.5 1,198.5 16 144.5 110.0 Present study
3 Neptunia oleracea 3,583 2,616 20 146 107 Present study
4 Neptunia oleracea * 3,814.2 1,866.7 29.7 142.3 105.3 Saupi, Zakaria & Bujang (2009)
5 Melochia corchorifolia 7,503.7 1,083.3 335 96.8 673 Umar et al. (2007)
6 Momordica balsamina 9,410 2,200 54.4 116 31.8 Hassan & Umar (2006)
7 Myrianthus arboreus 540 4,600 3.55 6.957 1.82 Amata (2010)
8 Achillea fragrantissima 14,400 1,200 4.44 88.5 400 Daur (2015)
9 Amaranthus virdis 15,280 8,255 12.44 108.1 356 Daur (2015)
10 Asteriscus graveolens 13,200 1,050 26.8 107.1 544 Daur (2015)
11 Chenopodium album 11,500 8,900 14.44 148 21.2 Daur (2015)
12 Conyza bonariensis 10,200 1,092 8.2 152.6 38.8 Daur (2015)

Notes.

*

Neptunia oleracea study by Saupi, Zakaria & Bujang (2009).