Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hematol Oncol. 2023 Jun;41(Suppl 1):112–118. doi: 10.1002/hon.3153

Table 1.

Summary of results from randomized trials comparing CD19-CAR T versus autologous stem cell transplant in patients with DLBCL who were refractory to R-CHOP or experienced disease progression within one year after the end of R-CHOP.

Study name and reference ZUMA-7 (19) TRANSFORM (21) BELINDA (20)
CD19-CAR T-cell in experimental arm Axi-cel Liso-cel Tisa-cel
Number of patients 359 184 322
Patients proceeding to CAR T vs. ASCT (%) 94% / 36% 97% / 47% 96% / 32%
Median time from registration to CAR T infusion 29 days 34 days 52 days
Bridging therapy allowed (% receiving bridging therapy) Steroids only One cycle of salvage chemotherapy (63%) One cycle or more of salvage chemotherapy (97%, including 54% >1 regimen)
Crossover to CAR (% who proceeded) Not planned (56% received cellular immunotherapy) Planned per protocol (63%) Planned per protocol (51%)
Median follow-up 25 months 17.5 months 10 months
Complete response rate (%) 65% vs 32% 74% vs 43% 28% vs 28%
Median event-free survival (months) 8.3 vs. 2 Not reached vs. 2.4 3 vs 3
Median progression-free survival (months) 14.7 vs. 3.7 Not reached vs. 6.2 na
Median overall survival (months) Not reached vs. 35.1 (0.73) Not reached vs. 29.9 (0.72) 16.9 vs. 15.3
Any grade CRS/NE (%) 92%/60% 49%/11% 61%/10%
Grade >=3 CRS/NE (%) 6%/21% 1%/4% 5%/2%

ASCT, high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell support; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; RCHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; NE, neurologic event.