Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;35(3):302–312. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002487

Table 4.

Predictive values of prognostic scores for the composite outcome

Scores AUC Youden index Cutoff value SEN (%) SPE (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Brier R2 P in H-L test
All patients
 CLIF-C AD 0.741 0.63 43 100.0 63.1 13.7 100.0 0.119 0.141 0.395
 CTP 0.730 0.40 7 84.6 55.9 10.1 98.4 0.121 0.126 0.064
 MELD 0.681 0.49 12 69.2 79.7 16.7 97.8 0.050 0.123 0.237
 MELD-Na 0.727 0.54 12 76.9 77.5 16.7 98.3 0.120 0.127 0.164
HBV patients
 CLIF-C AD 0.721 0.40 44 61.1 78.5 35.5 91.2 0.121 0.149 0.912
 CTP 0.724 0.32 6 94.4 37.6 22.7 97.2 0.122 0.152 0.619
 MELD 0.688 0.37 12 61.1 76.3 33.3 91.0 0.122 0.094 0.433
 MELD-Na 0.781 0.46 11 77.8 67.7 31.8 94.0 0.105 0.290 0.655
Non-HBV patients
 CLIF-C AD 0.751 0.51 42 94.4 56.6 27.0 98.4 0.117 0.144 0.371
 CTP 0.743 0.40 8 61.1 79.3 33.3 92.3 0.119 0.102 0.019
 MELD 0.682 0.45 8 94.4 34.0 19.5 97.3 0.122 0.049 0.198
 MELD-Na 0.684 0.29 8 100 29.3 19.4 100.0 0.123 0.031 0.057

AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CLIF-C AD, Chronic Liver Failure-Consortium Acute Decompensation; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; H-L test, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; MELD, Model for End-stage Liver Disease; MELD-Na, MELD-Sodium; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity.