Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Stigma Health. 2021 Jan 21;8(2):170–178. doi: 10.1037/sah0000290

Table 4.

Analyses of Separate Models+ for HIV Discrimination and Perceived Sexual Orientation Discrimination at Baseline—stratified by High and Low Perceived Racism—and Criminal Justice Involvement at Follow-up Among Black Young MSM, 2013–2016

Below mean racism score%

Odds ratio (OR) 95% CI P value
Model 1: HIV discrimination 1.07 0.97–1.19 .16
Model 2: Perceived sexual orientation discrimination 1.02 0.63–1.65 .92
Above mean racism score%

Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% CI P value

Model 1: HIV discrimination 1.07 0.91–1.25 .41
Model 2: Perceived sexual orientation discrimination 1.03 0.97–1.10 .29

Note:

%

Each of these three models controlled for age, multiracial, HIV status, relationship status, intervention group, employment, education, gender identity (transgender vs. cisgender), and sexual orientation.

+

Though presented side by side in this table the analyses for HIV discrimination and sexual orientation stigma represent separate models.